The "frontier" of Administration and Functions of Administrative Law

姜明安
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7504.2002.02.012
2002-01-01
Abstract:The Scope of administration depends on the different eras, different social and economic conditions, and demands for goods. In the meantime, it also depends on the understanding of cost-benefit of power. In traditional society, the demand for was small and naturally did not administer much. In modern society where the demand for goods greatly increased, should the functions of and scope of administration indefinitely expand? After solving part of the many complicated problems ( i.e. market malfunction ) in the modern society, the state and the omnipotent give rise to more complicated problems ( i.e. problems of corruption and social corruption). Hence, a proposal of limited government and power transformed into society (the third sector) are put forward. After power is transformed into social public power, does the conduct of executing social public power fall into the administrative category or it subject to regulation and control of law? What is the function of law? The perspectives of administration, power control, and balance hold different views. After correcting erroneous tendency of the traditional law's undue emphasis of administration or power control, modern law is gradually becoming a system of legal norms with regulation and control of power as the means and serving counterparts and safeguarding their legal rights and interests.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?