Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

On the New Idea of Administration by law

The "frontier" of Administration and Functions of Administrative Law

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

Quest for the Possible Way of Putting the ‘Letter and Visit' Into the Rule of Law

From Administration in Accordance with the Law to Law-based Government

The Indefinite Concept of Law Inferred from Administrative Tasks

The Flux of Clerical Work and the Change of Administration Law Model--Views on Public Administration and the Change of Administration Law Model Commentary

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Logic of Governance of Administrative Law

The Movement of New Public Administration and the Bureaucratic System

The Focus and Trends of American and European Administrative Laws

On Some Rational Thoughts about Constructing Legal State

Explanation of the Contract Meaning of Administrative Law

A Brief Account on the Administrative Idea of Service Government

A Developmental Research on Modern Administrative Activity Mode

On the Legal Restraint of Administrative Private Law Acts in Administrative Benefits

The analysis on economic administrative law

Glancing back Theoretical Foundation of Administrative Law : Evolution Of a Holism

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law