Biomechanics Research of Rebuilding Methods of Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament(ACL)

肖东民,陈素芳,李雄,王万春,李永国
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2005.12.010
2005-01-01
Abstract:【Objective】To compare the biomechanical nature of ACL in different rebuilding methods.【Methods】INSTRON 8032 electro-fluid servo-fatigue tester was used to test fresh normal cadaver knee ACL and cutting down ACL and reconstruction with one and double and three strands in single tunnel respectively.Superficial gab technique was used to fix the ligament while it was rebuilt with double and three strands.(【Results】)The value of displacement of cut ACL knee was much more than intact ACL knee.It would return to normal after mono-tunnel reconstruction with single and double and three strands.Comparatively speaking,in loading displacement of tibia and loading strain of ACL the single-tunnel reconstruction with double strands had better result than the others.It was more similar to normal ACL in biomechanical nature.【Conclusion】ACL should be rebuilt after injury.The single-tunnel reconstruction with double strands is more similar to normal ACL in biomechanical nature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?