Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

How to Learn from International Administrative Theories

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Notes on Contemporary Public Administration Theories in the West

On the "New Public Management" Theories and the Construction of Chinese Public Administration Theories

Glancing back Theoretical Foundation of Administrative Law : Evolution Of a Holism

Major Fields and Subjects for Public Administration Theory in China

On the Harmonious Concept in the Traditional Administrative Culture

Civilizational Politics and Civilizational Public Administration:The New Task for the Development of Politics and Public Administration in the New Era

How Can Stones from Another Mountain Be Used to Chisel the Local Jade——Issues and Problems Involved in Learning from Foreign Countries

On China's Lack of Theories Regarding its Participation in the Construction of International Organizations

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

Research on Paradigm of Chinese Public Administration:A Historical Review and Assesment

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

A Developmental Research on Modern Administrative Activity Mode

Three Subjects of Public Management Theory innovation

Governance and public administration in China

Democratic Administration and Democracy in Administration——And Discussion on the Direction and Dilemma of Chinese Administrative Reform

An Important Challenge for Today’s Human Resources Management ——On the Importance of Improving Civil Servants’ Learning Aptitude

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law