The Efficacy Compares of Platinum Regimen Chemotherapy among 60 Treat-naive Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients

SHI Yi,FANG Dizhu,WANG Haiping,XU Feng,ZHENG Hong,LI Yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8194.2008.02.012
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity between the new two-combined platinum regimen(TP,GP,NP) and the traditional three-combined(MVP,MIP) for treat-naive patients with advanced NSCLC,in order to prove the evidence based medicine in advanced non small cell lung carcinoma. Methods:30 patients with the new two-combined platinum regimen,12 with NP,11 with GP and 7 with TP; another 30 patients with the three-combined platinum regimen,17 with MVP and 13 with MIP. The clinical responses of these two groups are examined using X2 method and proved comparable. Results:49.2% of the average effective rate (CR+PR) using the two-combined platinum regimen (NP,QP,TP),middle survival time is 8.6 months,1-year survival is 38.3%;28.5% of the average effective rate(CR+PR) using the three-combined(MVP,MIP), middle survival time is 4.2 months,1-year survival is 18.6%.To compare these two groups’ curative effect and the middle survival time, the result is obviously(P0.05=;the same with the 1-year survival rate(P0.05).The main toxicity of these two groups are bone marrow suppression and nausea and vomitus, there is no statistic significance of the toxicity between these two groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The two-combined is more effective than the three-combined in advanced non small cell lung carcinoma. The middle survival time is improved, but there is no obviously difference of the toxicity between these two methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?