Comparison of Different Regimen in Treatment of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
CHEN Ling,ZHAO Xin-han,LI Xu,CHEN Hong,LI Jing,QUAN Ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2007.01.015
2007-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of four regimens for treatment of patients with IIIb~IV stage non-small cell lung cancer and provide the reference for clinic administration. Methods: A total of 95 patients were enrolled in this study,NP group 33 patients received NVB25mg/m~2,iv,d1,8,CDDP30mg/m~2,iv,d1~3;GP group 26 patients received GEM1000mg/m~2,iv,d1,8,CBP300mg/m~2,iv,d1; TC group 33 patients received taxotere35mg/m~2,iv,d1,8,15, CBP300mg/m~2,iv,d1;NG group 16 patients received NVB25mg/m~2,iv,d1,8,GEM1000mg/m~2,iv,d1,8.Effect was determed after two cycles treatment. Results: CBR of four groups were 75.7%,92.3%,90%,81.2%.There didn' t have significant difference(P=0.77). Amelioration ratio of quality of life were 30.3%,30.8%,45%,31.3%. There didn' t have significant differece(P=0.844). Side effects of III-IV degree: leucocytopenia, ferrohemoglobin decrease, thrombocytopenia were similar(P=0.19,P=0.096,P=0.013);NP group had significant differece with other groups in digestive system reaction. Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of NVB + CDDP,GEM+CBP,taxotere+ CBP,GEM+ NVB are similar, side effects are different. Clinical administration should be according to individualization doctrine.