Systematic experimental comparison of particle filtration efficiency test methods for commercial respirators and face masks
Joel C. Corbin,Greg J. Smallwood,Ian D. Leroux,Jalal Norooz Oliaee,Fengshan Liu,Timothy A. Sipkens,Richard G. Green,Nathan F. Murnaghan,Triantafillos Koukoulas,Prem Lobo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01265-8
IF: 4.6
2021-11-09
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Abstract Respirators, medical masks, and barrier face coverings all filter airborne particles using similar physical principles. However, they are tested for certification using a variety of standardized test methods, creating challenges for the comparison of differently certified products. We have performed systematic experiments to quantify and understand the differences between standardized test methods for N95 respirators (NIOSH TEB-APR-STP-0059 under US 42 CFR 84), medical face masks (ASTM F2299/F2100), and COVID-19-related barrier face coverings (ASTM F3502-21). Our experiments demonstrate the role of face velocity, particle properties (mean size, size variability, electric charge, density, and shape), measurement techniques, and environmental preconditioning. The measured filtration efficiency was most sensitive to changes in face velocity and particle charge. Relative to the NIOSH method, users of the ASTM F2299/F2100 method have commonly used non-neutralized (highly charged) aerosols as well as smaller face velocities, each of which may result in approximately 10% higher measured filtration efficiencies. In the NIOSH method, environmental conditioning at elevated humidity increased filtration efficiency in some commercial samples while decreasing it in others, indicating that measurement should be performed both with and without conditioning. More generally, our results provide an experimental basis for the comparison of respirators certified under various international methods, including FFP2, KN95, P2, Korea 1st Class, and DS2.
multidisciplinary sciences