Blood Pressure Measurement Multicentre Trial

吕卓人,薛小临,石志红,吕元吉,王玉茹,徐金凤,翟大玲,胡申江,苏群,林明,蔡洪斌,黄永升,黄达梅,张锦明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2002.01.004
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the evidence of accurate blood pressure measurement. Methods The indirect blood pressure were compared with the direct intra-aorta readings in 169 cases from 6 hospitals. Results ①The indirect systolic blood pressure(SBP) showed an average 6.4mmHg higher then the direct intra-aorta SBP(P0.0001)with good correlation(r=0.863).②Phase IV Korotkoff sounds appeared 8.4mmHg higher (P0.0001) than the direct diastolic blood pressure(DBP), but Phase V Korotkoff sounds disappeared an average 1.9mmHg lower and almost closed to the direct DBP. ③Phase V Korotkoff sounds disappeared an average 5.7mmHg lower significantly(P0.005)than the intra-aorta DBP in eldly(≥65yr) ④The lowest value among the 2~3 readings closed mostly to the direct blood pressure. Conclusion Following the evidences in this clinical trial, the indirect blood pressure measurement technique was recommended in order to maximize the accuracy and reliability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?