Abstract:Background and objective: Aortic blood pressure (ABP) is a more effective prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease than peripheral blood pressure. A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave, based on ultrasonic measurement of aortic flow combined with peripheral pulse wave measurements, has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). The objective of this study is to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. Methods: We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform from non-invasively determined aortic blood flow velocity, aortic diameter, and radial pressure. The two aortic variables were acquired by an ultrasound system from 90 subjects, followed by recordings of radial pressure using a SphygmoCor device. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization (invasive validation, 8 subjects aged 62.3 ± 12.7 years) and a SphygmoCor device (non-invasive validation, 82 subjects aged 45.0 ± 17.8 years). Results: In the invasive comparison, there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures: the mean error in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 1.4 ± 0.8 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 0.9 ± 0.8 mmHg; mean blood pressure (MBP), 1.8 ± 1.2 mmHg and pulse pressure (PP), 1.4 ± 1.1 mmHg. In the non-invasive comparison, the estimated and directly measured pressures also agreed well: the errors being: SBP, 2.0 ± 1.4 mmHg; DBP, 0.8 ± 0.1 mmHg; MBP, 0.1 ± 0.1 mmHg and PP, 2.3 ± 1.6 mmHg. The significance of the differences in mean errors between calculated and reference values for SBP, DBP, MBP and PP were assessed by paired t-tests. The agreement between the reference methods and those obtained by applying the new approach was also expressed by correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion: The new method proposed here can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic. Short abstract: A highly accurate algorithm for non-invasively deriving the ABP wave has been proposed elsewhere. However, it has remained at the proof-of-concept stage because it requires a priori knowledge of the ABP waveform to calculate aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). This study aims to transform this proof-of-concept algorithm into a clinically feasible technique. We used the Bramwell-Hill equation to non-invasively calculate aortic PWV which was then used to reconstruct the ABP waveform. The ABPs estimated by the new algorithm were compared with reference values obtained by cardiac catheterization or a SphygmoCor device. The results showed that there was good agreement between the estimated and directly measured pressures. The new method proposed can accurately estimate ABP, allowing this important variable to be obtained non-invasively, using standard, well validated measurement techniques. It thus has the potential to relocate ABP estimation from a research environment to more routine use in the cardiac clinic.

COMPARISON OF CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (CSBP) ESTIMATED BY DIRECT CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE (DCBP) FORMULA AND RADIAL TONOMETRY BY SPIGMOCOR: AN INVASIVE VALIDATION STUDY

Assessing the Accuracy of Systolic Aortic Pressure Estimation From a Brachial Cuff Alone: A Comparison With Radial Tonometry

Blood Pressure Measurement Multicentre Trial

Accurate detection of Korotkoff sounds reveals large discrepancy between intra-arterial systolic pressure and simultaneous noninvasive measurement of blood pressure with brachial cuff sphygmomanometry

Accuracy of the WatchBP Office Central as a Type 2 device for non-invasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in children and adolescents

In silico data-based comparison of the accuracy and error source of various methods for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure

Associations between central and brachial blood pressure in patients with hypertension and aortovascular disease: Implications for clinical practice

Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter

PS-C08-1: ACCURACY OF CUFF BLOOD PRESSURE AND SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION

Validation of oscillometric ratio and maximum gradient methods for non-invasive blood pressure measurement with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements as reference

Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods

O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Patient-specific non-invasive estimation of the aortic blood pressure waveform by ultrasound and tonometry

Discrepancy Of Blood Pressure Between The Brachial Artery And Radial Artery

Measuring blood pressure from Korotkoff sounds as the brachial cuff inflates on average provides higher values than when the cuff deflates

The Effect of Three Different Cuff/Arm Circumference Ratios Ranging over 80% on Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements

Comparison of cuff inflation and cuff deflation brachial sphygmomanometry with intra-arterial blood pressure as reference

Central arterial pressure and arterial pressure pulse: new views entering the second century after Korotkov.

Evaluation of the oscillometric method for noninvasive blood pressure measurement during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial blood pressure

Association Between Inter-Arm Difference In Sbp And Central Blood Pressure In A Beijing Community Cohort

Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Non-Invasive Radial Artery Applanation Tonometry and Invasive Arterial Catheter Demonstrates Good Agreement in Patients Undergoing Colon Carcinoma Surgery