Abstract:Objective To develop measurement methodology using film for the positioning accuracy of MLC leaves in IMRT.Methods The solid water phantom of 30 cm x 30 cm was scanned and the scanned images were transferred to TPS for treatment plan formulation.The five MLC strip picket fence pattern was formed by MLC leaves,each 3.0 cm long × 6.0 mm wide.The separation between strip and strip is 3.0 cm.SAD is 100 cm at dmax for 6 MV X-ray,with 250 MU per MLC strip.EBT2 radiochomic film was put on the phantom for delivery of IMRT,for each MLC strip.The present study focused on 30 accelerators of Varian,Elekta and Siemens designs at 27 hospitals with highly skilled physicists all over Jiangsu,Sichuan,Hubei and Henan provinces.The study was conducted in the same way as used in international multi-radiotherapy center (IMRC).The irradiated films were sent respectively to IAEA dosimetry laboratory and external audit group (EGA) of China for measurement,analysis and calculation.Results According to IAEA requirements,the differenc of film-measured and TPS-planned of MLC leaf position for each strip should be within ±0.5 mm.China had participated in the research of IMRC,with the result of 0.3,0.2,0.0,-0.1,and-0.2 mm,respectively.For 30 accelerators in four provinces involved in the study,the IAEA's verification results of MLC leaf position were within 0.6-1.0 mm for 5 accelerators and within ± 0.5 mm for other 25 ones.Whereas the verification results of EAG were within 0.6-1.0 mm for 6 accelerators and within ±0.5 mm for other 24 ones.According to IAEA requirements,the film-measured MLC leaf position deviation for each pair of leaves and average all pairs of leaves should be within ±0.5 mm.China had participated in IMRC's research,with the measured result being 0.04 mm.The verification result of EGA for 30 accelerators showed the measured MLC leaf position deviations were all ＜0.3 mm per strip,consistent with IAEA requirements.The IAEA's result showed the measured deviations of MLC leaf position for 29 accelerators were within ±0.5 mm,with only other one being-0.7 mm not consistent with the IAEA requirements.As required by IAEA,the difference of film-measured difference of MLC opening width should be within ±0.75 mm between each pair and average all pairs of leaves.China's result in research of IMRC showed the difference of minimum width to mean width was-0.2 mm whereas the difference of maximum width to mean width was 0.4 mm.For 30 accelerators involved in IAEA'verification study,the measured result shown that the difference between maximum and average of filmmeasured of MLC leaf width,and between minmum and average,were within ± 0.75 mm for 24 accelerators,in line with the IAEA requirements.For other 6 ones,the values were beyond ±0.75 mm,not in line with the IAEA requirements.For the verification result of EAG,the difference between maximum and average widths and between minmum and average widths for 25 accelerators were within ±0.75 mm as required by IAEA,whereas for other 5 ones the value were beyond ±0.75 mm,not consistent with IAEA requirements.The standard deviation of film-measured MLC opening width between each pair and average all pairs should be within 0.3 mm as required by IAEA.China's IMRC result was 0.12 mm.The verification result of IAEA shown the standard deviation of MLC opening position were ＜0.3 mm for 26 accelerators and ＞ 0.3 mm for other 4 accelerators.EAG verification result were the same as IAEA result.Conclusions The method using radiochromic film for measuring accuracy of MLC leaf position is convenient and practicable as a quality audit.It is suitable for quality verification in medical institutions owing to easy to post and repeated measurements.

Comparison of the Positioning Accuracy in MLC Quality Assurance using Various Detectors

SU-FF-T-174: A New Device for the Verification of Temporal Function of the 4DCT and Gating Delivery System

Development of Methodology for the Positioning Accuracy of MLC Leaves in IMRT

MR‐linac MLC positioning QA by digitally stitching dual double‐exposed films

A novel EPID‐based MLC QA method with log files achieving submillimeter accuracy

A novel quality assurance procedure for trajectory log validation using phantom-less real-time latency corrected EPID images

Performance assessment of a 2D array of plastic scintillation detectors for IMRT quality assurance

Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT

Identical Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Elekta and Varian Machines

Performance comparison of four common LINAC daily QA instruments

A Maximum Likelihood Gamma Positioning Method with Accurate Calibration of the Mean Detector Response Function in a Clinical SPECT Detector

Implementation and validation of 2-D-array based tests in routine linac quality assurance

WE‐E‐141‐06: Identical Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Elekte and Varian Machines

Assessing quality assurance of multi‐leaf collimator using the structural similarity index

Quality assurance for multileaf collimator with radiographic film exposed by slit beam

Error detection using a multi‐channel hybrid network with a low‐resolution detector in patient‐specific quality assurance

Angular correction methodology and characterization of a high-resolution CMOS array for patient specific quality assurance on a robotic arm linac

Dosimetric verification of annual quality assurance for a linear accelerator using a transmission type detector

Systematic evaluation of spatial resolution and gamma criteria for quality assurance with detector arrays in stereotactic radiosurgery

Automated Verification Of Multileaf Collimation (Mlc) Using A Siemens Epid

Collimator-less 4π Gamma Imaging with 3-D Position-Sensitive Detector