Abstract:The abolition of the judicial interpretation issued by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China in Qi Yuling's case marks the end of the trend of developing a judicial constitutional review system in China, but issues of courts invoking constitutional norms in judicial decisions continue to arise. This essay investigates the actual situation of the Constitution in judicial decisions by categorizing 1907 court decisions that invoked the Constitution as the reasoning basis and the court decisions which invoked the Constitution as the decision-making basis and by exploring the logic of the use of the Constitution by Chinese judges. In the absence of a constitutional review system, the primary sense of Chinese judges invoking constitutional norms is characterized by "simplistic reasoning ", "politicized enforcement " and the "parent law " concept. The insufficient judgment reason is a universal feature of judicial adjudication in Chinese courts. However, due to the lack of a constitutional review system, the poor perception of the interpretation and application of the constitution may exacerbate the lack of legal arguments invoked by the Constitution. The political model of Constitution enforcement in China makes judges invoke the Constitution in judicial decisions by "asserting the prestige of the Constitution ", which leads to numerous errors in legal argumentation in judicial decisions. This also reflects the tendency of "political enforcement " to take precedence over the legal enforcement of the Constitution. The influence of the old "parent law " concept is that judges can arbitrarily apply constitutional norms directly to civil cases, including fundamental rights norms. By summarizing and describing the above three features, we can depict the activities of current Chinese courts in invoking the Constitution.

Analysis on the Review of Unconstitutional Act in China

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Establishing Judicial Review in China

"Constitutional Review" in China:Characteristics and Actuality of Generating——From the Perspective of the Tactics for Change of Three Related Terms

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story

A Comparative Study on the Review System of Fair Competition between China and Foreign Countries

Analysis of Review Activity of Local Regulations by the State Council——Based on"Potential Difference Doctrine of Organizational Relations"

Institution of Invalidation of Acts in Action in Civil Law System--the Review of Three Legal Texts

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

Research on the Civil Action Whose Content is Illegal in the Perspective of Comparative Law

Theoretical Reflection of Strengthening the Unconstitutional Census System

A Legal Analysis on Establishment of a Fair Competition Review Mechanism in China- A case study based on Opinions for Establishing a Fair Competition Review

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

On the Possible Influence of Constitutional Interpretation on Justice

Reflection on Constitutional Controversies about China's Administrative Division Structure