Abstract:Background and objective: The modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies have been widely used in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, but what is the optimization has not been clearly defined. This meta-analysis is to elucidate the benefits from modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. The clinical outcomes were divided into early (<= 6 months) and late (>6 months) events according to the follow-up duration. The early endpoints included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and the late endpoints also include stent thrombosis in addition to the early endpoints index. The angiographic endpoint was in-stent restenosis. Data were analyzed by the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3). Results: A total of 6 studies involving 1683 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were included in this meta-analysis, which found that the modified double-stent strategy was associated with a lower risk of cardiac death (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.11-0.78, P = .01), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P = .01), target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63, P = .001), and MACE (OR= 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P = .003) compared with provisional stenting in the early follow-up endpoint events, while the risk of cardiac death and stent thrombosis were similar between both strategies (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.31-1.10, P = .09; and OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.15, P = .13; respectively) in the late follow-up endpoint events. There were significant differences between both strategies in myocardial infarction (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.75, P = .003), MACE (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, P < .00001), and target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.49, P < .00001) between both strategies in the late follow-up endpoint events. The risk of in-stent restenosis favored the modified double-stent strategy (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.43, P < .00001). Conclusion: The modified double-stent strategy is associated with excellent clinical and angiographic outcomes except for the occurrence of cardiac death and stent thrombosis late-term outcome compared with provisional stenting strategy in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. These findings suggest that the modified double-stent strategy can be recommended as an optimization in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.

Single stent versus double stents in treatment of bifurcatoin lesions of coronary

[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with 6F-guiding catheter by transradial approach].

Clinical Observation of Simple Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Prognostic Impact of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation after Single or Double Stent Left Main Bifurcation PCI

BIFURCATION STENTING FOR UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISTAL LESIONS IN THE DRUG ELUTING STENT ERA: ONE-YEAR CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP RESULTS FROM A SINGLE CENTRE

Study on DK crush versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions

Study of elective double stenting versus provisional stenting in diabetic patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions

P38 SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE STENTING IN NSTEMI PATIENTS WITH COMPLEX LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION DISEASE

Left Main Bifurcation Stenting: the Impact of Strut Thickness on Long-Term Outcomes.

Single versus Double Stenting in NSTEMI Patients with Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease

Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Of Functionally-Guided Treatment Of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Drug-eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of Simultaneous Kissing Stent Technique Versus Single Stent Technique in True Coronary Bifurcations

Coronary artery double stenting techniques and their results in complex left main bifurcation disease

Modified Double-Stent Strategy May Be an Optimal Choice for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Two-Stents Techniques for Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions

Complex coronary bifurcation treatment by a novel stenting technique: Bench test, fluid dynamic study and clinical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes after Recanalization of a Chronic Total Occluded Vessel with Bifurcation Lesions: Results from Single-Center, Prospective, Chronic Total Occlusion Registry Study.

Immediate, Short-Term, Intermediate, and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of True Bifurcation Stenting

Comparison of Drug Eluting Stents with Bare Metal Stents in Daily Practice for Bifurcation Lesions in Chinese Patients.

Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial