Study of elective double stenting versus provisional stenting in diabetic patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions

LIU Zhi-zhong,SHAN Shou-jie,ZHANG Jun-jie,TIAN Nai-liang,YE Fei,LIN Song,CHEN Shao-liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2012.04.004

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To varify whether provisional strategy remains better selection than double stenting strategy for the patients with diabetes and true coronary bifurcation lesions.Methods The study population was patients from DK-Crush trialⅠ-Ⅳ and received sirolimus-eluting stents.Of these,211 patients with diabetes and angiographic true bifurcation lesions were enrolled.119 cases underwent provisional strategy were assigned to PS group and other 92 cases underwent double stenting strategy to DS group.Results The primary end points of the study were the MACE rates after the 9-months follow up and the secondary end points were the restenosis rates of the main and side branches.In the PS group,stent implantation in the side branch(SB) was allowed by the T-stenting technique only when at least 1 of the following conditions was met:residual stenosis ≥50%;dissection of type B or worse;or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow<3.In the DS group,the bifurcation were treated with the double-kissing-crush stenting in 56 cases(60.9%),T-stenting in 26 cases(28.3%),and Culotte technique in 10 cases(10.9%).Final kissing balloon inflation(FKI) and high-pressure post dilating were mandatory steps of the procedure.The primary end point(a composite at 9 months of death,myocardial infarction,and target-vessel revascularization) was similar for both groups(13.0% vs.11.8% for DS group vs.PS group,P=NS).Likewise,the rates of angiographically confirmed stent thrombosis and angiographic restenosis in the MB did not differ between the two groups during follow-up(both P=NS).But,the SB restenosis in DS group was significantly less than that in PS group(19.6% vs.38.7%,P=0.003).Conclusions In the patients with with diabetes and true bifurcation lesions,clinical results at 9 months follow-up were similar and favorable using either double stenting or provitional strategy.However,double stenting strategy signifcantly reduces angiographic side-branch restenosis as compared with provitional strategy.