Comparison of Clinical Results for Two Different Methods for Treatment of Early Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

张劲松,杨述华,许伟华,叶树楠,迮仁浩,雷鸣

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5572.2010.05.004

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results of the treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implantation of porous tantalum and transplantation of greater trochanteric bone flap pedicled with blood vessel.Methods We treated 43 patients(48 hips)with early osteonecrosis of the femoral head,from February 2007 to May 2008.Patients with Ficat-Ⅰ,Ⅱ osteoneerosis were randomly assigned to be treated with implantation of porous tantalum(group A) and transplantation of greater trochanteric bone flap pedicled with blood vessel(group B).The group A consisted of twenty-four patients(twenty-nine hips),and the group B consisted of nineteen patients(nineteen hips).The patients in these two groups had similar demographic characteristics,duration and stage of disease,and duration of follow-up.The evaluation parameters included the operative time,the volume of blood loss,Harris hip scores,radiographic assessment and the incidence of complication.Results All the patients were followed up for a mean of 26 months(range,18～32 months).The final valuation was based on the documents of the last fellow up.The two groups had significant differences on surgical time,blood loss,transfusions and development of X-ray picture(P0.05).The Harris Hip Score were improved significantly in two groups.Conclusion Compared to transplantation of greater trochanteric bone flap pedicledwith blood vessel,mini-invasive treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implantation of porous tantalum have the merit of simplicity,minimally invasive,shorter surgical time,little hemorrhage and no transfusion.It had better clinical effect.It is one of the better alternatives that can prevent the necrosis femoral head from progressing to collapse.