Comparison of Clinical Results for Implantation of Allogeneic Bone Support Frame and Titanium Alloy Support Frame for Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

梅荣成,杨述华,杨操,李进,叶哲伟,吴强
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8478.2007.18.001
2007-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To compare the clinical results of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implanting allogeneic bone support frame and alloy support frame.[Method]Patients with Ficat-Ⅰ,Ⅱ,or Ⅲ osteonecrosis were randomly assigned to be treated either with implantation of allogeneic bone support frame,autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix or with implantation of titanium alloy support frame,autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix.The allogeneic bone support frame group (group A) consisted of thirty-two patients (thirty-four hips),and the titanium alloy support frame group (group B) consisted of thirty-one patients (thirty-four hips).The patients in these two groups had similar demographic characteristics,duration and stage of disease,and duration of follow-up.The evaluation parameters included the operative time,the volume of blood loss,Harris hip scores,radiographic assessment and the incidence of complication.[Result]All the patients were followed up for a mean of 47 months (range,24~67 months).The mean Harris hip score improved for 91.3% of the hips in group A: twenty hips (59%) were rated excellent,ten (29%) were rated good and four (12%) were rated fair,excellent and good rate was 88.2%.The mean Harris hip score improved for 90.7% of the hips in group B: twenty hips (59%) were rated excellent,eleven (32%) were rated good and three (9%) were rated fair,excellent and good rate was 91.2% (P0.01).[Conclusion]The allogeneic bone support frame implanting,just like the alloy support frame implanting,could increase mechanical support and decrease the stress for femoral head.It could promote revascularization and new bone formation for necrotic femoral head.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?