Retrospective analysis of clinically failed implants following porous tantalum implantation for femoral head osteonecrosis

Jinhui Ma,Wei Sun,Wanshou Guo,Zirong Li,Bailiang Wang,Weiguo Wang,Zhencai Shi,Debo Yue,Zhaohui Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2017.04.002
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical results and radiographic outcomes of porous tantalum implant in the treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH).Methods A total of 101 ONFH patients (117 consecutive hips) treated with porous tantalum implant combined with bone grafting between June 2008 and December 2013 in China-Japan friendship hospital were evaluated.The inclusion criteria: diagnosis of non-traumatic ONFH.The exclusion criteria: surgical contraindication, having received any other type of surgical treatment, and secondary arthritis.According to the classification system of Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO), 49 hips were in stageⅡ, and 68 hips were in stageⅢ;as to China-Japan friendship hospital (CJFH) classification, 15 hips were type L1, 59 hips were type L2, 40 hips were type L3, three hips were type C.The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software.The t test or one-way analysis of variance was used to compare pre-and postoperative Harris hip score (HHS) among different groups.A chi-square test or Fisher exact text was performed to compare the rate of radiological progression and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) among different groups.The Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the independent factors associated with conversion to THA and radiological failure.Results Ninety patients (104 hips) were available for follow-up with a mean time of (46±21) months.The mean age was (39 ± 8) years.At the last follow-up or before converting to THA, the mean postoperative HHS score for all the hips (69±15) was less than the mean preoperative HHS score (76±13) (t=3.939, P<0.01).Overall 49 hips converted to THA.According to analysis of Cox risky model, age, CJFH type and ARCO stage were independent risk factors for conversion to THA and failure of radiography.Conclusion Porous tantalum implantation is not a viable option for the treatment of ONFH, and the clinical failure is associated with age more than 40 years old, preoperative ARCO Ⅱ stage, and CJFH L3 type;it is necessary to work out strict indications for this procedure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?