Comparison of the Effect of Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation and Permanent Pacing Versus Atrioventricular Nodal Modification in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

HAN Ming-hua,GUO Tao,ZHAO Ling,LIU Zhong-mei,LI Shu-min,LIU Guo-bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2006.01.007
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of atrioventricular nodal ablation and permanent pacing(AVNAP) or atrioventricular nodal modification(AVNM) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods 32 patients with drug refractory AF were divided into AVNAP group(18) and AVNM group(14).The patients were measured the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) by the echocardiogram,tested by the 6 minu te walking test(6-MWT),assessed by NYHA function classification and the Mos 36~item short from health surrey(SF~36) before or after the treatments respectively.Results Mean follow up is 14 months.In AVNAP group,LVEF was increased from(47±9)% to(57±6)%(P0.01),NYHA function class was decreased from 2.2±0.7 to 1.4±0.5(P0.05),the distance of 6-MWT was significantly prolonged,the quality of life(QOL) of SF-36 was improved significantly.The frequency of hospital admission and antiarrhythmic drug taken in by the patients were significantly reduced after AVNAP.LVEF,NYHA function class,6-MWT and QOL were not better improved in AVNM group than in AVNAP group.Conclusions AVNAP and AVNM both were effective in the treatment of patients with drug refractory AF,but AVNAP is better than AVNM and drug.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?