Comparison on the Left Atrial Anterior Wall Ablation Through Low-voltage Area Versus Left Lateral Mitral Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Wuyang ZHENG,Weihua LI,Qiang XIE,Xiaoqun WAN,Zhengrong HUANG,Ziguan ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2016.21.045
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficiency and safety of left atrial anterior wal ablation through low-voltage area versus left lateral mitral isthmus ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrilation.Methods Sixty patients with persistent atrail fibrilation from August 1,2012 to September 30,2013 were enroled and divided into two groups according to the evolution of ablation strategies: LAAW(left atrial anterior wal ablation through low-voltage) and LLMI(left lateral mitral isthmus ablation).ResultsThe achievement of bidirectional block of LAAW was higher than LLMI ablation(78.6%vs. 53.6%). During folow-up of 18 months,the recurrence rate of atrial fibrilation after LAAW ablation was significantly lower than that of LLMI ablation(25.0%vs. 53.6%).Conclusion Linear ablation along left atrial anterior wal through low-voltage is safe and may results in a better clinical outcome with a higher rate of bidirectional conduction block to LLMI ablation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?