Abstract:Environmental impact assessment (EIA) system has been established in China since 1973. In present EIA cases, there are four participants in general: governments, enterprises, EIA organizations and the public. The public has held responsible for both social costs and social duties. The public supervises social costs produced by enterprises discharging pollutant in EIA. However public participation is mostly deputized by governments, which severely weaken the independence of the public as one participant in EIA. In this paper, EIA refers to the different attitudes of the participants whose optional strategies may be described by a proper game model. According to disfigurements in EIA, three sides (governments, enterprises, and EIA organizations) dynamic iterative game theory, dynamic game theory of incomplete information, and perfect Bayesian equilibrium theory to analyze the reciprocity relation among governments, EIA organizations and enterprises. The results show that in a short period, economic benefit is preponderant over social benefit. Governments and enterprises both do not want to take EIA to reveal social costs. EIA organizations’ income comes from enterprises and the collusions are built between them to vindicate economic benefit. In a long run, social benefit loss caused by environmental pollution must be recuperated sooner or later and environmental deterioration will influence the achievements of economic benefit, so both governments and enterprises are certain to pursue high social benefit and willing to take EIA, helpful to increase private benefit. EIA organizations will make fair assessment when their economic benefit are ensured. At present, the public as silent victims can not take actual part in EIA. The EIA system must be improved to break the present equilibrium of three sides, bringing the public to the equilibrium to exert public supervision.

Discussion on Problems and Countermeasures of Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment

Comment on the System of Public Participation in EIA in China

Public Participation Modes in China's Environmental Impact Assessment Process: an Analytical Framework Based on Participation Extent and Conflict Level

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

A Cognitive Study on Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment of Beijing Residents

Review on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning in China

Difficulties and Countermeasures on Public Participation in Environmental Monitoring and Management

Government Responsibilities for Public Participation in China's Environmental Protection——Based On Environmental Information Disclosure Responsibilities

Public Participation in Planning EIA to Initially Resolve Social Conflicts

Public Participation in Environmental Management in China: Status Quo and Mode Innovation

Game Theoretic Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment System in China

Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation

Evaluation on the implementation effect of public participation in the decision-making of NIMBY facilities

Effects and Drawbacks of Environmental Impact Assessment in Avoiding NIMBY

Study on Public Participation Mechanism in Basin Water Pollution Control

Discussion on Public Participation for Urban Plan in Information Era

Studies on Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness

Effectiveness Research on Public Participation in Environmental Governance Based on P-S-A Three-tier Model

A Comparative Analysis of Public Participation Approaches in Environmental Decision-Making in Western Countries

Planning Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China: Status Quo, Implementation Problems and Legislative Reform

Chapter 2 Public Participation in China's Environmental Protection