Abstract:Popular concepts in urban planning, like the 15-minute city, suggest that everyday services should be accessible to everyone within "walking distance". However, walking distance is usually considered from the perspective of the average person, and little effort is made to understand the temporal (daily and seasonal) variation in walking accessibility. If our aim is to create inclusive cities, we also need to address the realities of vulnerable population groups. In this study, we analysed how walking accessibility landscapes vary temporally and between population groups particularly focusing on the diverse realities of older people. We hypothesised that the temporal variation, especially seasonal, disproportionately influences their range of mobility options. To test this, we first recorded walking speeds in Finland's Helsinki Metropolitan Area during dry and winter season. We then created and compared accessibility landscapes between groups with different walking characteristics by integrating data on seasonal walking speeds, diurnal activity opening hours, and the (residential) locations of people. We showed that the diurnal variation has the largest effect on walking accessibility in the study area over seasonal and age-related variation when these variables are considered separately. Combined, these variations can explain reductions in accessibility that, in the worst-case scenario result in only 34% of the older population having 15-minute walking access to the closest grocery shop, compared to a baseline of 93%. However, the intra-group variation between population groups and road conditions remains large. The study highlights the importance of considering the variation in people's walking abilities, road conditions and service network when modelling walking accessibility. This is particularly important for vulnerable population groups, such as older people, who often rely on running errands on foot and may have impaired mobility. The results support spatial planners to mitigate social and spatial inequalities and help them to promote environmentally sustainable transport.

Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions

A universal framework for inclusive 15-minute cities

Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework

The 15-minute city quantified using human mobility data

Cities beyond proximity

Time, the other dimension of urban form: Measuring the relationship between urban density and accessibility to grocery shops in the 10-minute city

A city of cities: Measuring how 15-minutes urban accessibility shapes human mobility in Barcelona

The 15-Minute City: An Attempt to Measure Proximity to Urban Services in Rome

Advancing Health Equity through 15-min Cities and Chrono-urbanism

Compact 15-minute cities are greener

The X-Minute City: Analysing Accessibility to Essential Daily Destinations by Active Mobility in Seville

The 15-Minute City Quantified Using Mobility Data

Developing a 15-minute city: A comparative study of four Italian Cities-Cagliari, Perugia, Pisa, and Trieste

Reconceptualizing Proximity Measurement Approaches through the Urban Discourse on the X-Minute City

Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods. An evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities

Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but only for the wealthy

The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility

Toward a Healthy Urban Living Environment: Assessing 15-Minute Green-Blue Space Accessibility

From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment

City composition and accessibility statistics in and around Paris

Travel behaviour and the 15-min City: Access intensity, sufficiency, and non-work car use in Toronto