Abstract:The Cultural and Creative Cities Monitor (CCCM) is a valuable tool to measure and compare European cities’ cultural and creative vitality. It addresses three dimensions: the presence of cultural venues and facilities (i.e., Cultural Vibrancy); the jobs and innovations connected to the so-called creative industries (i.e., the Creative Economy); and the enabling conditions for culture and creativity diffusion: human capital, diversity, trust and openness, international accessibility, and connectivity (i.e., an Enabling Environment). Comparing and ranking cities on these different dimensions offer policymakers the possibility of developing strategies related to their development (Montalto et al. 2019). However, as is recognized in the report presenting the CCCM, significant methodological limitations exist. They are related to both the tool and the potential behavioral implications it generates (JRC-OECD Handbook, 2008) and to the difficulties with addressing a multifaceted phenomenon with scant data, which offer limited opportunities to adequately measure cultural and creative cities (Van Puyenbroeck et al. 2021). In this paper, we integrate the CCCM framework to propose a spatially contextualized application at the city level as a tool to support policymakers’ understanding of the potential role of cultural and creative organizations in city development (Soini and Dessein, 2016). We, therefore, build our arguments on a recent stream of research showing the importance of the spatial dimension to understand the relevance of cultural and creative industries within a context and inform decision-makers (Boal-San Miguel and Herrero-Prieto, 2020). This spatial dimension is even more important at the city level, where public, private, and non-profit organizations interact to execute culture-led policies (Bonet and Négrier, 2018). In this case, the location of specific organizations may be critical in offering opportunities at the neighborhood level, paving the way to space-driven local level policies (e.g., the 15 min walking strategy; see e.g., Pisano, 2020).

Developing a 15-minute city: A comparative study of four Italian Cities-Cagliari, Perugia, Pisa, and Trieste

A universal framework for inclusive 15-minute cities

Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods. An evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities

The 15-Minute City: An Attempt to Measure Proximity to Urban Services in Rome

Compact 15-minute cities are greener

15-minute Cities: a literature overview exploring international planning strategies

Enhancing Public Space Accessibility and Inclusivity in Residential Neighbourhoods: A Methodological Framework and Pilot Application

15-Minute City: Decomposing the New Urban Planning Eutopia

A method for assessing the vitality potential of urban areas. The case study of the Metropolitan City of Cagliari, Italy

Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework

The Future of the City in the Name of Proximity: A New Perspective for the Urban Regeneration of Council Housing Suburbs in Italy after the Pandemic

The 15-minute city concept: The case study within a neighbourhood of Thessaloniki

Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions

The 15-minute city quantified using human mobility data

Bringing Back in the Spatial Dimension in the Assessment of Cultural and Creative Industries and Its Relationship with a City’s Sustainability: The Case of Milan

From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment

The X-Minute City: Analysing Accessibility to Essential Daily Destinations by Active Mobility in Seville

Indicators as Mediators for Environmental Decision Making: The Case Study of Alessandria

Public City as Network of Networks: A Toolkit for Healthy Neighbourhoods

Graph Representation of the 15-Minute City: A Comparison between Rome, London, and Paris

Cities beyond proximity