Abstract:Autonomous lifelong development and learning is a fundamental capability of humans, differentiating them from current deep learning systems. However, other branches of artificial intelligence have designed crucial ingredients towards autonomous learning: curiosity and intrinsic motivation, social learning and natural interaction with peers, and embodiment. These mechanisms guide exploration and autonomous choice of goals, and integrating them with deep learning opens stimulating perspectives. Deep learning (DL) approaches made great advances in artificial intelligence, but are still far away from human learning. As argued convincingly by Lake et al., differences include human capabilities to learn causal models of the world from very little data, leveraging compositional representations and priors like intuitive physics and psychology. However, there are other fundamental differences between current DL systems and human learning, as well as technical ingredients to fill this gap, that are either superficially, or not adequately, discussed by Lake et al. These fundamental mechanisms relate to autonomous development and learning. They are bound to play a central role in artificial intelligence in the future. Current DL systems require engineers to manually specify a task-specific objective function for every new task, and learn through off-line processing of large training databases. On the contrary, humans learn autonomously open-ended repertoires of skills, deciding for themselves which goals to pursue or value, and which skills to explore, driven by intrinsic motivation/curiosity and social learning through natural interaction with peers. Such learning processes are incremental, online, and progressive. Human child development involves a progressive increase of complexity in a curriculum of learning where skills are explored, acquired, and built on each other, through particular ordering and timing. Finally, human learning happens in the physical world, and through bodily and physical experimentation, under severe constraints on energy, time, and computational resources. In the two last decades, the field of Developmental and Cognitive Robotics (Cangelosi and Schlesinger, 2015, Asada et al., 2009), in strong interaction with developmental psychology and neuroscience, has achieved significant advances in computational

Developmental Reinforcement Learning through Sensorimotor Space Enlargement

Off-Dynamics Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Modular Deep Q Networks for Sim-to-real Transfer of Visuo-motor Policies

Modular deep reinforcement learning from reward and punishment for robot navigation

Deep Reinforcement Learning Boosted by External Knowledge

Learning a World Model With Multitimescale Memory Augmentation

Unsupervised Learning of Goal Spaces for Intrinsically Motivated Goal Exploration

Imagined Value Gradients: Model-Based Policy Optimization with Transferable Latent Dynamics Models

Exploring unknown environments: motivated developmental learning for autonomous navigation of mobile robots

A psychology based approach for longitudinal development in cognitive robotics

Maximum diffusion reinforcement learning

Pixel to policy: DQN Encoders for within & cross-game reinforcement learning

Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation

Learning To Walk With Prior Knowledge

Deep Reinforcement Learning in Parameterized Action Space

Autonomous development and learning in artificial intelligence and robotics: Scaling up deep learning to human--like learning

Continual Reinforcement Learning in 3D Non-stationary Environments

Neural Modulation for Reinforcement Learning in Developmental Networks Facing an Exponential No. of States

On the Role of the Action Space in Robot Manipulation Learning and Sim-to-Real Transfer

DCT: Dual Channel Training of Action Embeddings for Reinforcement Learning with Large Discrete Action Spaces

Whole-Body Control Through Narrow Gaps From Pixels To Action