Modular deep reinforcement learning from reward and punishment for robot navigation

Jiexin Wang,Stefan Elfwing,Eiji Uchibe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.12.001
Abstract:Modular Reinforcement Learning decomposes a monolithic task into several tasks with sub-goals and learns each one in parallel to solve the original problem. Such learning patterns can be traced in the brains of animals. Recent evidence in neuroscience shows that animals utilize separate systems for processing rewards and punishments, illuminating a different perspective for modularizing Reinforcement Learning tasks. MaxPain and its deep variant, Deep MaxPain, showed the advances of such dichotomy-based decomposing architecture over conventional Q-learning in terms of safety and learning efficiency. These two methods differ in policy derivation. MaxPain linearly unified the reward and punishment value functions and generated a joint policy based on unified values; Deep MaxPain tackled scaling problems in high-dimensional cases by linearly forming a joint policy from two sub-policies obtained from their value functions. However, the mixing weights in both methods were determined manually, causing inadequate use of the learned modules. In this work, we discuss the signal scaling of reward and punishment related to discounting factor γ, and propose a weak constraint for signaling design. To further exploit the learning models, we propose a state-value dependent weighting scheme that automatically tunes the mixing weights: hard-max and softmax based on a case analysis of Boltzmann distribution. We focus on maze-solving navigation tasks and investigate how two metrics (pain-avoiding and goal-reaching) influence each other's behaviors during learning. We propose a sensor fusion network structure that utilizes lidar and images captured by a monocular camera instead of lidar-only and image-only sensing. Our results, both in the simulation of three types of mazes with different complexities and a real robot experiment of an L-maze on Turtlebot3 Waffle Pi, showed the improvements of our methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?