Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Pricing Strategies and Mechanism Choice in Reward-Based Crowdfunding.

Reward-Based Crowdfunding vs. Initial Coin Offering

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Versus Initial Coin Offerings

An Incentive Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Systems with Network Effects

Keep It or Give Back? Optimal Pricing Strategy of Reward-Based Crowdfunding with a Hybrid Mechanism in the Sharing Economy

Pricing Strategies in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: Whether to Introduce Price Guarantee?

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding

Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard

Pricing Decisions on Reward-Based Crowdfunding with Bayesian Review System Facing Strategic Consumers

Intermediation in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: a Cash Deposit Mechanism to Reduce Moral Hazard

A Cash‐strapped Creator's Reward‐based Crowdfunding Strategies with Spot Sales

The inverted U-shaped relationship between crowdfunding success and reward options and the moderating effect of price differentiation

Reward-Based Crowdfunding: The Role of Information Disclosure

CFRI-11-2019-0152_proof 230..258

Project Implementation Success in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: an Empirical Study

Rethinking investors' herding behavior under the conditions of reward-based crowdfunding platform

Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur

Analysis of the evolutionary game of reward-based crowdfunding platforms and entrepreneurs

When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?