Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the microstructure and plastic deformation behavior of friction stir welded 2024
Zhili Hu,Shijian Yuan,Xiaosong Wang,Gang Liu,Yongxian Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.035
IF: 9.417
2011-01-01
Materials & Design
Abstract:To improve the plasticity of friction stir welded joints for plastic processing applications, post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) of 2024-O aluminum alloy friction stir welding joints was carried out at annealing temperatures from 250 °C to 450 °C with an interval of 50 °C for 2 h, followed by cooling to 200 °C in the furnace. The effect of PWHT on the microstructure and plastic deformation behavior of the joints was investigated. It was found that the fine-equiaxed grains are stable and retained in the nugget of the joints even after annealing at 450 °C for 2 h. However, the grains in the thermo-mechanically affected zone (TMAZ) of the joints become coarse and equiaxed as annealing temperature increases. The plastic deformation of as-welded joint is very heterogeneous. In contrast, the plastic deformation of PWHT joint is relatively homogeneous by both the nugget and the base material showing large deformation. The decrease in elongation of as-welded joints is completely recovered by PWHT. The high ductility of the joint is mainly attributed to the retention of the fine-equiaxed grains in the nugget during PWHT. 1 Introduction Due to economical and ecological reasons as well as to improve product properties, aluminum alloy welds, which show high production efficiency and flexibility, have gained more interest in manufacturing lightweight structures for automotives and aircrafts [1–3] . The industrial application of aluminum alloy welds in lightweight constructions is basically connected to one fundamental manufacturing requirement. The formability of welds must be adequate in order to shape the required geometries [4] . It is well known that high-strength aluminum alloys (2XXX series) are widely used for aerospace structures such as fuselage, fins and wings [5] . Unfortunately, such high-strength aluminum alloys are difficult to join by conventional fusion welding due to the occurrence of hot cracking during welding [6] . Friction stir welding (FSW), as a solid state metal joining technique, do prove itself ideal for creating better quality joints compared to fusion welds [6–8] . However, many studies on the transverse tensile properties of FSW joints indicated that the elongations of as-welded joints are only 20–40% those of the BM for the heterogeneous microstructure of the joint [6,9–11] . To improve the mechanical properties of FSW joints, one option is to fully post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) of the welded components. Currently the PWHT mainly consists of solution heat treatment and precipitation or aging treatment, aiming to recover the loss of tensile strength in the nugget zone [12–15] . A few studies on the PWHT of FSW aluminum alloys such as 7449 [14] , 6061-O [12] , 2219-O [13] and 2024-T4 [15] had shown that the PWHT recovered a large portion of the lost strength in the nugget, but there was an accompanying loss in ductility. The joints have a 40–77% decrease in elongation compared to that of base material (BM). In addition, studies in this area have shown that the fine grains in the nugget are not stable during PWHT, which results in undesirable coarsened grain structures [12–20] . This kind of microstructural instability has been identified as abnormal grain growth (AGG). Although in a few studies AGG has proved to be beneficial to recover the lost strength of joint, it is not at all desirable for enhanced plasticity [17–19] . Ductility falls off sharply due to extreme microstructural instability [18,19] . Accordingly, it is necessary to find out some effective remedial process to improve the elongation of joints, and avoid AGG occurring in the nugget at same time. Normally the friction stir welds are used in the as-welded condition or with stabilization aging when BM is in the hardened conditions (T3, T4 and T6 tempers). However, there are some advantages in carrying out the welding with BM in a soft condition. The forming operation after FSW can be much more easily performed if the welding is conducted under O condition. Furthermore, the solution and aging heat treatment can restore the mechanical properties of the joints successfully after the forming operation [12–15,20] . The present letter analyzes the microstructure and plastic deformation behavior of FSW aluminum alloys to evaluate if, with the right selection of post-weld annealing treatment parameters, their plasticity and strength could be optimized. 2 Experimental procedures Some 5 mm-thick 2024 aluminum alloy rolled plates were FSW with a travel speed, a rotational speed and a shoulder diameter of 300 mm/min, 600 rpm and 14 mm, respectively. Then the plates were cut into two parts, one part for PWHT and the other for as-welded examinations. The PWHT included annealing at different temperature from 250 °C to 450 °C with an interval of 50 °C for 2 h, followed by cooling to 200 °C in the furnace. Following FSW and PWHT, The orientation-imaging microscope (OIM) was attached to an S-570/HITACHI-4700 scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 25 kV. The OIM was used to evaluate grain size distribution with step size of 1 μm. The Vickers micro-hardness test was carried out along the centerlines of the cross-sections with a distance between neighboring measured points of 1 mm under a load of 100 g for 10 s. The transverse tensile specimens were prepared with reference to China National Standard GB/T2651-2008 [21] (equivalent to ASTM B557-02 [22] ). The room temperature tensile tests were performed at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min using an Instron-1186 testing machine. An axial extensometer with 25 mm gage length was attached to the test specimens at the gage section. The strain analysis of each specimen was made by the ASAME® automatic strain measuring system, and the tensile properties of the joints were evaluated using three tensile specimens cut from the same joint. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Microstructures The OIM images of joints in the transition zone from the nugget to thermo-mechanically affected zone (TMAZ) are shown in Fig. 1 . The nugget of as-welded joint is composed of fine-equiaxed recrystallized grains with average grain size of 1.7 μm as seen in Fig. 1 a. After PWHT, average grain size in the nugget of the 300 °C annealed joint and the 450 °C annealed joint are1.8 μm and 2.0 μm, respectively. It indicates that the fine-equiaxed grains are stable in the nugget during PWHT ( Fig. 1 b and c) and no AGG is observed even the annealing temperature up to 450 °C. However, the grain size and shape in the TMAZ vary significantly with the annealing temperature. The initial grains in the TMAZ are rotated and elongated in an upward flowing pattern around the nugget before PWHT ( Fig. 1 a). Such phenomenon can also be observed in the TMAZ of the 300 °C annealed joint ( Fig. 1 b), but nearly all the grains in the TMAZ of the joint become coarse and equiaxed after annealing at 450 °C ( Fig. 1 c). It indicates that the rotated and elongated grains in the TMAZ of joints tend to be coarse and equiaxed with the increasing annealing temperature. The back scattered SEM micrograph in the nugget of FSW joint is shown in Fig. 2 . There are two different particles in the as-weld joint, marked by A and B ( Fig. 2 a). The Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) analysis showed that these particles are compounds of Al–Cu–Mg and Al–Cu–Fe–Mn ( Fig. 2 c and d). According to the literatures these compounds are most likely Al 2 CuMg and (Cu, Fe, Mn) Al 6 [23,24] . As seen in Fig. 2 a, the grain size of the strengthening precipitates such as rod or lath shaped Al 2 CuMg are 0.2–0.5 μm, and also it is shown that some of the particles present in the as-welded joint dissolve and slightly coarsen during PWHT. As seen in Fig. 2 b, a much-reduced density of particles with the grain size of 0.5–2 μm is observed after annealing at 450 °C. It is known that strengthening precipitates such as rod or lath shaped Al 2 CuMg can coarsen or dissolve during high temperature heat treatment [6] , while particles, including Fe and Mn, are insoluble in aluminum alloys [25] . Therefore all particles, which can be seen in SEM image after PWHT, are undissolved Al 2 CuMg and insoluble (Cu, Fe, Mn) Al 6 particles. It is reported that a dispersed, thermally stable precipitates may help to control the AGG behavior [16] . Consequently joints do not show any sign of AGG during PWHT and the fine-equiaxed grains are retained in the nugget. 3.2 Micro-hardness The micro-hardness profiles of the joints before and after PWHT can be seen in Fig. 3 . The maximum micro-hardness value of the as-welded joint can reach two times that of the BM. It is known that the hardness in the precipitation-hardening aluminum alloys greatly depends on the grain size and precipitate distribution [26] . The nugget of the as-welded joint is composed of the recrystallized fine-equiaxed grains ( Fig. 1 a) for experiencing intense plastic deformation and frictional heating during FSW [7] . Therefore, the joint is strengthened by FSW process. The micro-hardness values of PWHT joints vary depending on the annealing temperature. The micro-hardness value in the nugget of PWHT joint is slightly higher than that of the BM after annealing at 300 °C, but when the annealing temperature is above 300 °C, the micro-hardness values of the PWHT joints are almost same with that of the BM. It indicates that the micro-harnesses values in the nugget of the PWHT joints decrease with the increasing annealing temperature. It is mainly due to the dissolving and the coarsening of precipitates resulted from the thermal history during PWHT ( Fig. 2 ). 3.3 Tensile properties and fracture surfaces The room temperature tensile properties are summarized in Table 1 . The as-welded joint possesses the same tensile strength as that of the BM. However, the elongation of the joint is 12.5%, which shows a 44% reduction in elongation compared with that of the BM. After PWHT, the elongation of the joints has been significantly improved, and increases with decreasing annealing temperature. The maximum elongation of the joints is up to 20.2% after annealing at 300 °C, equivalent to 1.6 times that of the as-welded joint. Furthermore, all joints show nearly the same tensile strength as that of the BM at different annealing temperature, as shown in Table 1 . It can be attributed to the presence of a dispersed, stable precipitates, which increases strength by pinning grain boundaries and by also interfering with dislocation motion [27] . These results indicate that the plasticity of as-welded joint can be improved by PWHT effectively with no loss of tensile strength. An examination of the tensile fracture surfaces does provide useful information pertaining to the role and contribution of the intrinsic microstructural features on strength and ductility of the joints [9,15] . The fracture surfaces of the tensile tested specimens are characterized using SEM. The SEM photographs are taken from the center regions of the tested specimens, and the pictures are presented in Fig. 4 . The fractures of joints are predominantly transgranular. As seen in Fig. 4 a, an array of randomly fine microscopic cracks and a population of voids of varying size and shape are distributed through the fracture surface of as-welded joint. Cracked second-phase particles and shallow dimples are found covering the transgranular fracture region. Such phenomena can also be observed in fracture faces of PWHT joints. However, The depth and width of the observed dimples in fracture face of the 300 °C annealed joint ( Fig. 4 b) are more, compared with the as-welded joint ( Fig. 4 a) and the PWHT 450 °C joint ( Fig. 4 c). It is reported that the size of the dimples in the fracture surfaces could be indicative of the ductility of FSW joints [9] . The size of the dimples in the fracture surface of joint is large. It suggests that a large stretch zone is present at the tip of the crack. This led to a large plastic zone ahead of the crack and rather high ductility [10] . Consequently, the 300 °C annealed joint shows higher ductility than the as-welded joint and the 450 °C annealed joint. As the dimples increase in size ( Fig. 4 ), the elongation of the joints also increases ( Table 1 ). 3.4 Plastic deformation behavior The microstructure variation occurring through the weld results in a heterogeneous strain distribution when a tensile test is carried out normal to the welding direction, as shown in Fig. 5 . The retreating side and advancing side of each joint are denoted by RS and AS, respectively. As shown in Fig. 5 a, the BM on the advancing side locally elongated to high levels of strain (over 30%), eventually resulting in necking and fracture, whereas the strain of the nugget and the BM on the retreating side experience only 4% and 10%, respectively. It shows that regional deformation of as-welded joint is highly inhomogeneous. It is mainly because the strength of the nugget is higher than that of the BM for the grain size strengthening (average grain size in the nugget is 1.7 μm). Thus deformation in the nugget is small during tensile test. It can be concluded that the highly inhomogeneous deformation throughout the joint, caused by heterogeneous microstructure, is the reason for the 44% decrease in elongation of the as-welded joint compared with that of the BM. The strain map of the 300 °C annealed joint is shown in Fig. 5 b. The plastic deformation concentrates in the BM on the advancing side with the local strain exceeding 30%. The average strain of the nugget and the BM on the retreating side is about 8% and 12%, respectively. It indicates that the deformation inhomogeneity of the joint has been improved by both the nugget and the BM showing large strain, especially, the average strain in the nugget is two times that of the as-welded joints. The slightly harder nature of the nugget promotes plastic deformation of the BM during transverse tensile tests, up to fracture in this zone. Therefore, the joint shows relatively homogeneous deformation and the elongation of the joint increases. The high ductility of the PWHT joint is mainly attributed to the retention of the fine-equiaxed grains in the nugget during PWHT [28] . The strain map of the 450 °C annealed joints on the retreating side is shown in Fig. 5 c. The distribution of the strain for the 450 °C annealed joints is completely different. The deformation localizes in the nugget and TMAZ. This localization extends until fracture, which happens at the nugget/TMAZ boundary. The fracture locations of joints change with the annealing temperature, which can be explained by the grain coarsening in the TMAZ after annealing at 450 °C ( Fig. 1 c). The interface between the nugget and the TMAZ is more clearly visible and becomes a weaker region resulting in the fracture along the interface as seen in Fig. 5 c. When fracture happens, local strain in the interface is only 17%. However, the fracture strain of the as-welded joint and the 300 °C annealed joint are over 30%, indicating that the fracture toughness of the 450 °C annealed joint is low. The decrease in fracture toughness can be correlated to the grain coarsening in the TMAZ and the decrease of precipitates in the nugget after annealing at 450 °C [12,15] . This low fracture toughness results in a much lower ductility of the joint. 4 Conclusions In this study, the effect of PWHT on the microstructure and plastic deformation behavior of the joints was investigated, and the following conclusions are obtained. (1) The decrease in elongation of as-welded joints is completely recovered by PWHT. The maximum elongation of the PWHT joint is 1.6 times that of the as-welded joints with no loss of tensile strength. (2) The AGG are not observed in the joints during PWHT at 250–450 °C, and the fine-equiaxed grains are retained in the nugget of the joints. However, the grains in the TMAZ of the joints coarsen with increasing annealing temperature. The interface between the nugget and TMAZ become more clearly visible and results in the fracture along the interface. (3) Tensile fractures of PWHT joints are predominantly transgranular, and fracture surface is covered with dimples of varying size and shape, reminiscent of locally ductile failure. The depth and width of the observed dimples in fracture face of the 300 °C annealed joint are more, compared with the as-welded joint. As the dimples increase in size, the elongation of the joints also increases. (4) The micro-hardness value in the nugget of PWHT joint is slight higher than that of the BM after annealing at 300 °C. When annealing temperature is above 300 °C, the micro-hardness values of PWHT joints are almost same with that of the BM. The micro-hardness of the PWHT joints decreases with the increase of annealing temperature. (5) The plastic deformation of as-welded joint is very heterogeneous, but the plastic deformations of the PWHT joints are relatively homogeneous by both the nugget and the BM showing large strain. The slightly harder nature of the nugget promotes plastic deformation of the BM during transverse tensile tests, up to fracture in the BM. (6) A follow on work is planned to study the effect of post-weld heat treatment on mechanical properties of FSW joints in order to improve joint strength. References [1] S.J. Yuan C. Han X.S. Wang Hydroforming of automotive structural components with rectangular-sections Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46 2006 1201 1206 [2] M. Garware G.T. Kridli P.K. Mallick Tensile and fatigue behavior of friction-stir welded tailor-welded blank of aluminum alloy 5754 J Mater Eng Perform 19 2010 1161 1171 [3] M.P. Miles B.J. Decker T.W. Nelson Formability and strength of friction-stir-welded aluminum sheets Metall Mater Trans A 35A 2004 3461 3468 [4] M. Merklein M. Wieland D. Staud Friction stir welds made out of precipitation hardenable aluminum alloys-experimental investigations of formability potential Int J Mater Form 2 2009 323 326 [5] A. Heinz A. Hasler C. Keidel S. Moldenhauer R. Benedictus W.S. Miller Recent development in aluminum alloy for aerospace applications Mater Sci Eng A 280 2000 102 107 [6] C. Genevois A. Deschamps A. Denquin B. Doisneau-cottignies Quantitative investigation of precipitation and mechanical behaviour for AA2024 friction stir welds Acta Mater 53 2005 2447 2458 [7] R. Nandan T. DebRoy H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia Recent advances in friction-stir welding-process, weldment structure and properties Prog Mater Sci 53 2008 980 1023 [8] R.S. Mishra Z.Y. Ma Friction stir welding and processing Mater Sci Eng R 50 2005 1 78 [9] T.S. Srivatsan S. Vasudevan L. Park The tensile deformation and fracture behavior of friction stir welded aluminum alloy 2024 Mater Sci Eng A 466 2007 235 245 [10] H. Aydın A. Bayram A. Uguz S.K. Akay Tensile properties of friction stir welded joints of 2024 aluminum alloys in different heat-treated-state Mater Des 30 2009 2211 2221 [11] W.F. Xu J.H. Liu G.H. Luan C.L. Dong Temperature evolution, microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded thick 2219-O aluminum alloy joints Mater Des 30 2009 3460 3467 [12] K.N. Krishnan The effect of post weld heat treatment on the properties of 6061 friction stir welded joints J Mater Sci 37 2002 473 480 [13] Y.C. Chen H.J. Liu J.C. Feng Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the mechanical properties of 2219-O friction stir welded joints J Mater Sci Lett 41 2006 297 299 [14] A. Sullivan J.D. Robson Microstructural properties of friction stir welded and post-weld heat-treated 7449 aluminum alloy thick plate Mater Sci Eng A 478 2008 351 360 [15] H. Aydın A. Bayram I. Durgun The effect of post-weld heat treatment on the mechanical properties of 2024-T4 friction stir-welded joints Mater Des 31 2010 2568 2577 [16] I. Charit R.S. Mishra Abnormal grain growth in friction stir processed alloys Scr Mater 58 2008 367 371 [17] Y.C. Chen J.C. Feng H.J. Liu Stability of the grain structure in 2219-O aluminum alloy friction stir welds during solution treatment Mater Charact 58 2007 174 178 [18] I. Charit R.S. Mishra High strain rate superplasticity in a commercial 2024 Al alloy via friction stir processing Mater Sci Eng A 359 2003 290 296 [19] K.A.A. Hassan A.F. Norman D.A. Price P.B. Prangnell Stability of nugget zone grain structures in high strength Al alloy friction stir welds during solution treatment Acta Mater 51 2003 1923 1936 [20] J.C. Feng Y.C. Chen H.J. Liu Effects of post-weld heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints of 2219-O aluminium alloy Mater Sci Technol 22 2006 86 90 [21] China National Standard, GB/T2651-2008. Tensile test method on welded joints. China; 2008. [22] ASTM Standards, ASTM B557-02. Standard test methods of tension testing wrought and cast aluminum- and magnesium-alloy products, USA; 2002. [23] L.F. Mondolfo Aluminum alloys: structure and properties 1976 Butterworth London [24] Brooks CR. Heat treatment, structure and properties of nonferrous alloys. Metals Park (OH, USA): ASM 1984. [25] I.V. Cravetchi M. Taschuk Y.Y. Tsui R. Fedosejevs Spectrochemical microanalysis of aluminum alloys by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy Spectrochim Acta B 59 2004 1439 1450 [26] Y.S. Sato S.H.C. Park H. Kokawa Microstructural factors governing hardness in friction-stir welds of solid-solution-hardened Al alloys Metall Mater Trans A 32A 2001 3033 3042 [27] M.J. Starink A. Deschamps S.C. Wang The strength of friction stir welded and friction stir processed aluminium alloys Scr Mater 58 2008 377 382 [28] Mishra RS, Sharma SR, Mara NA, Mahoney MW. Mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum alloys. in: Proceedings of the international conference on jointing of advanced and specialty materials III. ASM International; 2000.