Effect of Different Volume Dose Calculators on Configuring a DVH-Estimation Model for Knowledge-Based Lung SABR Planning

Y. Zhang,S. Li,M. Wang,H. Wu,H. Yue,F. Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.441
2017-01-01
Abstract:Significant inaccuracy of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) calculated dose distribution has been reported especially for heterogeneous media. A literature proven better algorithm, Acuros XB (AXB) is recently used for all lung cases at our center, yet omitting vast historical AAA plans may waste valuable knowledge and geometric varieties for Varian RapidPlan knowledge-based model development. This study aims to investigate: 1. how inconsistent calculator of model library affects knowledge-based lung Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) planning; 2. whether re-calculating AAA plans with AXB is necessary and benefits model configuration. Model_AAA and Model_AXB for lung SABR were configured with 27 historical AAA plans and their AXB recalculations respectively. Identical optimization objective settings were embedded into both models. Model quality was assessed via statistical metrics and dosimetric performance by re-planning new clinical AXB plans using model-generated objectives. Consistent with literature, AAA significantly overestimated target dose than AXB, leading considerable under-dose (Table 1). Statistical model verification suggested consistent deteriorated coefficient of determination for all OARs in Model_AXB. DVH evaluation of re-planned clinical AXB plans suggested improved target coverage and reduced OAR exposure after applying RapidPlan. Using the same optimization objective settings (yet the generated parameters were knowledge- and model-dependent), Model_AAA achieved better target coverage than Model_AXB. OAR sparing of both models were comparably satisfactory. A possible theoretical explanation is RapidPlan extracts the final results of dose-volume computation without considering the process and approach. Despite of the inaccuracy of AAA, the historical plans represent clinical preferences and acceptable tradeoffs, which should be passed to the prospective knowledge-based planning using AXB.Abstract 1013; Table 1Model_AAAModel_AXBDifferenceITV mean dose % Min100.35100.310.04 Max108.66108.370.29 Mean104.04103.880.16 SD1.932.22-0.29PTV mean dose % Min92.6191.860.75 Max104.91103.871.04 Mean101.51100.21.31 SD2.983.11-0.13Coefficient of determination Esophagus0.8870.8780.009 Heart0.9430.9210.022 Lungs0.9760.9720.004 Ribs0.9590.9420.017 Spinal Cord0.9040.8870.017 Spinal Cord + 5 mm0.8990.8880.011 Open table in a new tab RapidPlan achieved better plan quality than manual planning. Knowledge library composed of historical AAA plans can be used to configure RapidPlan model which was successfully applied to AXB planning for prospective patients. Recalculation historical AAA plans with AXB is unnecessary and can even be detrimental by introducing insufficient target coverage to the knowledge base.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?