Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Volatility forecasting using high frequency data: The role of after-hours information and leverage effects

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

Forecasting Stock Volatility Using Time-Distance Weighting Fundamental’s Shocks

Chinese Stock Market Volatility and the Role of U.S. Economic Variables

Asymmetry of return distribution, abnormality of intradaily risk based on quantile regression model with high-frequency data from Shanghai stock market

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Volatility of Chinese futures market based on ACD model

An empirical study on information spillover effects between the Chinese copper futures market and spot market

Modeling the Impact of Overnight Surprises on Intra-daily Stock Returns

What Are Returns Outside Trading Hours Capturing for Volatility of Individual Stocks?

Measuring and Forecasting Stock Market Volatilities with High-Frequency Data

Can Interval Data Improve Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from Foreign Exchange Markets

Forecasting conditional volatility based on hybrid GARCH-type models with long memory, regime switching, leverage effect and heavy-tail: Further evidence from equity market

Stock Market Volatility Forecasting: Can Interval Data Improve It?

Financial Volatility Forecasting with Range-Based Autoregressive Volatility Model

The role of high-frequency data in volatility forecasting: evidence from the China stock market

COMEX Copper Futures Volatility Forecasting: Econometric Models and Deep Learning

Forecasting realised volatility from search volume and overnight sentiment: Evidence from China

Volatility Information in High-Frequency Financial Interval-Valued Time Series: A Direct Modeling Pattern

The Volatility in the Metal Spot - Futures Market in China

The role of oil futures intraday information on predicting US stock market volatility