Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Volatility of Chinese futures market based on ACD model

Research on China Futures Market Price Duration Volatility Cluster Effect

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Forecasting Stock Volatility Using Time-Distance Weighting Fundamental’s Shocks

Volatility analysis based on GARCH-type models: Evidence from the Chinese stock market

The role of high-frequency data in volatility forecasting: evidence from the China stock market

Study on Volatility of the Shanghai Stock Market Based on GARCH Models

Modeling Chinese stock markets' volatility

The Volatility in the Metal Spot - Futures Market in China

Intraday Dynamics of Volatility and Duration: Evidence from Chinese Stocks

China's Metal Volatility under the Impact of Oil and Exchange Rate Shocks

High-frequency Volatility Features, Forecast Model and Performance Evaluation

Research on relationships between volatility and returns, trading volume, open interest in Chinese futures market

Selected Application of Group of ARCH Models in Research on Volatility of Chinese Stock Markets

Volatility Persistence, Risk Premium, and Trading Volume in China Stock Market

Analysis of Factors Influencing Stock Market Volatility Based on GARCH-MIDAS Model

Analysis of Volatilities and Correlations for Chinese Stock Markets.

A new volatility model: GQARCH-Itô model

Dynamic Relationship Between Volume and Volatility in the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from the MS-VAR Model

Forecasting conditional volatility based on hybrid GARCH-type models with long memory, regime switching, leverage effect and heavy-tail: Further evidence from equity market