Quantifying Sources of Labor Market Power
Kyle Herkenhoff,David Berger,Simon Mongey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3850778
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Theoretically, monopsony power of the firms relative to their workers can come in many forms, each causing wages to be less than marginal revenue products of labor, but each having different welfare and policy implications. These include worker-firm specific amenities, search frictions, the density of outside options available through on the job search, and strategic interaction between finite employers. Meanwhile lower bargaining power of workers may further depress wages.How important are each of these for wages and welfare? To answer these questions we contribute a quantitative model with a finite number of firms (e.g. Berger et al, 2020; and Nimcsik et al, 2020), strategic wage setting and on the job search (e.g. Cahuc et al, 2006), and preference heterogeneity (e.g. Card et al, 2018). We show that in a Nash-Cournot equilibrium, vacancies are strategic substitutes, and so under-posted when discrete firms in concentrated markets act strategically relative to competitively. We also show that key objects, such as the quit elasticity, emerge naturally in our setting but have different interpretations relative to wage-posting models. We estimate the model, and use the estimated model to provide quantitative decompositions that answer these questions.