Abstract:A reasonably general theory for predicting the outcome of coevolution among interacting species is developed. It is applied to a model for resource partitioning among competing species.Current theory for resource partitioning is based on derivations of a “limiting similarity”—i.e., a limit to how similar competitors can be to one another consistent with coexistence. This theory presumes there is a mechanism, perhaps invasion and extinction, which causes competitors to attain the limiting similarity. The view taken in this paper is that partitioning is an evolutionary compromise between pressures for character displacement and disadvantages inherent in the shift to different resource types.A set of principles is offered for the evolution of the parameters in ecological models. (1) For single population models natural selection causes the parameters ultimately to assume those values which produce the highest equilibrium population size. (2) For models of interacting populations, but without interspecific frequency-dependence, natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce either the highest or lowest equilibrium population size for any species depending on the sign of the “feedback” in the community obtained by deleting that species. (3) For models of interacting populations with interspecific frequency dependence natural selection leads to parameter values which produce intermediate equilibrium population sizes. A function called the conditional equilibrium population size is introduced. Provided (a) the mean fitness is a maximum in each species at a stable coevolutionary equilibrium and (b) there is negative density-dependence in each species then natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce the highest conditional equilibrium population size for each species.These coevolutionary principles, applied to a model for resource partitioning, entail that the niche separation between species relative to given niche widths, increases with the variety of available resources and decreases with the number of competing populations. Also, the evolution of character displacement between two species does not proceed far enough to maximize the equilibrium population sizes of the species involved. These results imply that the relationship between the niche overlap (of nearest neighbors) and species diversity is qualitatively different depending on whether the variety of resources at any place covaries with the species diversity there. Without covariation niche overlap increases with species diversity; with covariation overlap may decrease with species diversity. This study provides the beginning of a theory for the convergent evolution of community structure.

Resource competition and technological diversity

Scarce Human Resources and Equilibrium Industry Structure

Metabolic Growth Theory: Market-Share Competition, Learning Uncertainty, and Technology Wavelets

Effects of resource competition on evolution and adaptive radiation

Global dynamics of a mutualism–competition model with one resource and multiple consumers

Competition for resources can reshape the evolutionary properties of spatial structure

Competing Technologies: Disturbance, Selection, and the Possibilities of Lock-in

Striving for balance: past choices and future expectations in a critical resource competition dynamic model

A Consumer-Resource Competition Model with a State-Dependent Delay and Stage-Structured Consumer Species

A Mechanistically Integrated Model of Exploitative and Interference Competition over a Single Resource Produces Widespread Coexistence

A graphical theory of competition on spatial resource gradients

Can Science and Technology Resources Co-Evolve with High-Tech Industries? Empirical Evidence from China

Dynamics of Performances in a Competitive Model

Competing Technologies: Lock-ins and Lock-Outs

Evolutionary Model of Cleaner Production Technologies under Product Competition and Consumer Choice

A competition model for two CPU vendors

The evolution and lock-in of technology

The Complex Dynamics of R&D Competition Models of Three Oligarchs with Heterogeneous Players

Mathematical Model Allowing the Coexistence of Closely Related Competitors at the Initial Stage of Evolution

A dynamic model of resource extraction and intensity of competition

Resource partitioning among competing species—A coevolutionary approach