Abstract:A reasonably general theory for predicting the outcome of coevolution among interacting species is developed. It is applied to a model for resource partitioning among competing species.Current theory for resource partitioning is based on derivations of a “limiting similarity”—i.e., a limit to how similar competitors can be to one another consistent with coexistence. This theory presumes there is a mechanism, perhaps invasion and extinction, which causes competitors to attain the limiting similarity. The view taken in this paper is that partitioning is an evolutionary compromise between pressures for character displacement and disadvantages inherent in the shift to different resource types.A set of principles is offered for the evolution of the parameters in ecological models. (1) For single population models natural selection causes the parameters ultimately to assume those values which produce the highest equilibrium population size. (2) For models of interacting populations, but without interspecific frequency-dependence, natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce either the highest or lowest equilibrium population size for any species depending on the sign of the “feedback” in the community obtained by deleting that species. (3) For models of interacting populations with interspecific frequency dependence natural selection leads to parameter values which produce intermediate equilibrium population sizes. A function called the conditional equilibrium population size is introduced. Provided (a) the mean fitness is a maximum in each species at a stable coevolutionary equilibrium and (b) there is negative density-dependence in each species then natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce the highest conditional equilibrium population size for each species.These coevolutionary principles, applied to a model for resource partitioning, entail that the niche separation between species relative to given niche widths, increases with the variety of available resources and decreases with the number of competing populations. Also, the evolution of character displacement between two species does not proceed far enough to maximize the equilibrium population sizes of the species involved. These results imply that the relationship between the niche overlap (of nearest neighbors) and species diversity is qualitatively different depending on whether the variety of resources at any place covaries with the species diversity there. Without covariation niche overlap increases with species diversity; with covariation overlap may decrease with species diversity. This study provides the beginning of a theory for the convergent evolution of community structure.

A Mechanistically Integrated Model of Exploitative and Interference Competition over a Single Resource Produces Widespread Coexistence

On A Resource Based Ecological Competition Model with Interference

Revisiting the R* theory: preemption enables multispecies coexistence on a single resource

Coexistence under Hierarchical Resource Exploitation: The Role of the R*-Preemption Trade-Off

Global dynamics of a mutualism–competition model with one resource and multiple consumers

Resource partitioning among competing species—A coevolutionary approach

Biological Interactions and Cooperative Management of Multiple Species

Coexistence under hierarchical resource exploitation: the role of R*-preemption tradeoff

Competitive Exclusion in an Artificial Foraging Ecosystem

A mutualism-competition model characterizing competitors with mutualism at low density

Mutualism or Cooperation among Competitors Promotes Coexistence and Competitive Ability

The Role of Space in the Exploitation of Resources

The Beddington–DeAngelis Competitive Response: Intra-Species Interference Enhances Coexistence in Species Competition

Coexistence and Extinction in a Data-Based Ratio-Dependent Model of an Insect Community

On the Dynamics of Two-consumers-one-resource Competing Systems with Beddington-DeAngelis Functional Response

Exploitative Competition of Microorganisms for Two Complementary Nutrients in Continuous Cultures

Models of experimental competitive intensities predict home and away differences in invasive impact and the effects of an endophytic mutualist

Competition and cooperation in one-dimensional stepping stone models

Robust coexistence in ecological competitive communities

Overcome Competitive Exclusion in Ecosystems

Competitive exclusion and coexistence in an intraguild predation model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response