Inequity in child health: The importance of early childhood development
S. Woolfenden,S. Goldfeld,S. Raman,V. Eapen,L. Kemp,Katrina Jane Williams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12171
2013-09-01
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Abstract:Child health inequalities were first described in the mid-19th century as differences in infant mortality rates across occupational and social classes. Despite an overall improvement in health and advances in health care in many high-income countries, inequalities in mortality and morbidity have persisted and widened. For most health conditions, there is a ‘social gradient’; the greater the social disadvantage, the higher the prevalence of disease. There is an increasingly robust evidence base for populationbased child health inequalities in Australia. Research from ‘Growing Up in Australia’, the Longitudinal Study of Australia’s Children, has demonstrated that social disadvantage is associated with poorer outcomes across most measures of physical and developmental health and that these start early in childhood, do not attenuate at older ages and have a clear gradient, with worse outcomes associated with increasing disadvantage. Most health professionals working with children will encounter inequalities in their daily practice related to service access and clustering of risk and to poor health, well-being and development among vulnerable populations of children (Table 1). The terms inequality and inequity are often used interchangeably to describe these differences in health status; however, they have quite different meanings. Inequality is a descriptive term that refers to differences between groups, such as a higher rate of cerebral palsy in preterm versus term babies. Inequity has a moral and ethical component. It refers to inequalities that are unfair, unjust, systematic, avoidable and unnecessary, such as the higher rate of preterm birth in children from socially disadvantaged groups compared with their more socially advantaged peers. There has been longstanding debate in the health inequity literature as to what would constitute an unfair and avoidable inequality, especially around the role of personal responsibility in health and our innate biological predisposition to conditions. The debate around personal responsibility for health choices is irrelevant for young children who are never responsible for their choices and in whom inequalities in their health and health-care access are intrinsically linked to the social determinants of health such as the safety and social capital of the community they live in, their family’s socio-economic position and ethnicity and the impact these have on home environment and the choices their parents make. With regard to the debate over the role of biology versus environment in the origin of inequalities, for some children an inequality may not be preventable or remediable because of biological differences, such as a chromosomal abnormality, but for the majority, social disadvantage contributes to or worsens any biological predisposition. Even for conditions where there is clearly a biological cause, there are inequalities in health outcomes that are related to social disadvantage. For example, children with cystic fibrosis from low-income families in the USA and UK have been found to have a significantly increased risk of death compared with those from higher income families.