Abstract:Sharing systems have facilitated the redistribution of underused resources by providing convenient online marketplaces for individual sellers and buyers. However, sellers in these systems may not fully disclose the information of their shared commodities, due to strategic behaviors or privacy concerns. Sellers' strategic information disclosure significantly affects buyers' user experiences and systems' reputation. This paper presents the first analytical study on information disclosure and pricing of competing sellers in sharing systems. In particular, we propose a two-stage game framework to capture sellers' strategic behaviors and buyers' decisions. Although the optimization problem is challenging due to sellers' non-convex and non-monotonic objectives, we completely characterize the complex market equilibria by decomposing it into several tractable subproblems. We demonstrate that full disclosure by all sellers or non-disclosure by all sellers will both lead to intense price competition. The former all-disclosure case is never an equilibrium even when all sellers have good commodity qualities and low privacy costs, while the latter non-disclosure case can be an equilibrium under which all sellers get zero profit. We also reveal several critical factors that affect sellers' information disclosure. Interestingly, sellers' sharing capacity limitation and buyers' estimation biases encourage information disclosure as they mitigate sellers' competition.

Information Sharing in Private Value Lottery Contest

Information Sharing in a Contest Game with Group Identity

Information Disclosure in Contests: Private Versus Public Signals

Optimal Information Exchange in Contests

Information revelation through bunching.

Forthcoming in the Economic Journal the Role of Information Revelation in Elimination Contests

Information Disclosure in Contests: A Bayesian Persuasion Approach

The Role of Information Revelation in Elimination Contests

Information Disclosure under Competition in Sharing Systems

Information Favoritism and Scoring Bias in Contests

Common-Value Auctions with Discrete Private Information

On Equilibrium Existence in Generalized Multi-Prize Nested Lottery Contests.

Disclosure Policy in Tullock Contests with Asymmetric Stochastic Entry

Prize and Punishment : Optimal Contest Design with Incomplete Information ∗

Incentives for information sharing in duopoly with capacity constraints

Disclosure Policies in Research Contests with Stochastic Entry

Encouraging Information Sharing to Boost the Name-Your-own-price Auction

Information Sharing When Firms Compete for Common-Value Customers.

Optimal Contest Design with Incomplete Information ∗