Abstract:Two potentially asymmetric players compete for a prize of common value, which is initially unknown, by exerting efforts. A designer has two instruments for contest design. First, she decides whether and how to disclose an informative signal of the prize value to players. Second, she sets the scoring rule of the contest, which varies the relative competitiveness of the players. We show that the optimum depends on the designer’s objective. A bilateral symmetric contest—in which information is symmetrically distributed and the scoring bias is set to offset the initial asymmetry between players—always maximizes the expected total effort. However, the optimal contest may deliberately create bilateral asymmetry—which discloses the signal privately to one player, while favoring the other in terms of the scoring rule—when the designer is concerned about the expected winner’s effort. The two instruments thus exhibit complementarity, in that the optimum can be made asymmetric in both dimensions even if the players are ex ante symmetric. Our results are qualitatively robust to (i) affiliated signals and (ii) endogenous information structure. We show that information favoritism can play a useful role in addressing affirmative action objectives.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Disclosure Policy in Tullock Contests with Asymmetric Stochastic Entry

Information Disclosure in Contests: Private Versus Public Signals

Disclosure and Favoritism in Sequential Elimination Contests

Information Disclosure in Contests: A Bayesian Persuasion Approach

Information Favoritism and Scoring Bias in Contests

Optimally Biased Tullock Contests

Multi-prize Contests with Risk-Averse Players

Optimal sequential contests

Coupling Information Disclosure with a Quality Standard in R&D Contests

Prize and Punishment : Optimal Contest Design with Incomplete Information ∗

On the Optimal Design of Lottery Contests

Optimal Contest Design with Incomplete Information ∗

Optimal Information Exchange in Contests

Information Sharing in Private Value Lottery Contest

Offsetting Distortion Effects of Head Starts on Incentives in Tullock Contests

Optimal and Robust Disclosure of Public Information

Competition among Parallel Contests

Forthcoming in The Economic Journal The Role of Information Revelation in Elimination Contests

Optimal contests with incomplete information and convex effort costs

Optimal Contest Design: Tuning the Heat