Dosimetric Comparison Of The Simulation Treatment Planning Of Flt And Fdg Pet-Ct In Contouring The Biological Tumor Volume In Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma
D. Han,J. Yu,G. Zhang,J. Lu,Z. Fu,W. Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1493
2010-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)Use the optimal method of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET-CT to delineate biological tumor volume in thoracic esophageal carcinoma and make treatment planning for simulation, then compare with that of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG) on the basis of dosimetric analysis.Materials/MethodsTwenty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma detected by FLT and FDG PET-CT were enrolled. We used Treatment Planning System to compare the simulation treatment planning based on the optimal threshold of FLT and FDG PET-CT, respectively. According to the same standard expanded GTV to CTV and PTV. The radiation dose was prescribed as 60 Gy in 30 fractions with conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy technique, the same patient using the same radiotherapy technique such as a five-beam CRT or seven-field IMRT. We compared parameters in dose-volume histograms of two groups planning which fields in the similar direction and ensuring prescribed dose line surround 95% target volume. SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, version 13.0; SPSS Inc.) was used for statistical analysis. The t test was used to assess the differences between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsGTV, CTV and PTV in FLT PET-CT imaging are less than those of FDG (All p value less than 0.05). There are no significantly difference in conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) between FLT and FDG PET-CT planning (Both p value more than 0.05). The difference in V20 of bilateral lung, V40 of heart and maximal dose received by spinal cord between FLT and FDG were not significantly (All p value more than 0.05). While, the values in MLD, V5, V10, V30, V40 and V50 of bilateral lung, MHD, and V30 of heart on FLT PET-CT based planning were significant lower than that of FDG(All p value less than 0.05).ConclusionsFLT PET-CT based treatment planning brought potential benefits to some OARs such as lungs and heart.[Key words] Esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy; Tomography, positron emission; 3-deoxy-3-fluorothymidine; Biological tumor volumes; Dosimetry Purpose/Objective(s)Use the optimal method of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET-CT to delineate biological tumor volume in thoracic esophageal carcinoma and make treatment planning for simulation, then compare with that of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG) on the basis of dosimetric analysis. Use the optimal method of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET-CT to delineate biological tumor volume in thoracic esophageal carcinoma and make treatment planning for simulation, then compare with that of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG) on the basis of dosimetric analysis. Materials/MethodsTwenty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma detected by FLT and FDG PET-CT were enrolled. We used Treatment Planning System to compare the simulation treatment planning based on the optimal threshold of FLT and FDG PET-CT, respectively. According to the same standard expanded GTV to CTV and PTV. The radiation dose was prescribed as 60 Gy in 30 fractions with conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy technique, the same patient using the same radiotherapy technique such as a five-beam CRT or seven-field IMRT. We compared parameters in dose-volume histograms of two groups planning which fields in the similar direction and ensuring prescribed dose line surround 95% target volume. SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, version 13.0; SPSS Inc.) was used for statistical analysis. The t test was used to assess the differences between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma detected by FLT and FDG PET-CT were enrolled. We used Treatment Planning System to compare the simulation treatment planning based on the optimal threshold of FLT and FDG PET-CT, respectively. According to the same standard expanded GTV to CTV and PTV. The radiation dose was prescribed as 60 Gy in 30 fractions with conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy technique, the same patient using the same radiotherapy technique such as a five-beam CRT or seven-field IMRT. We compared parameters in dose-volume histograms of two groups planning which fields in the similar direction and ensuring prescribed dose line surround 95% target volume. SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, version 13.0; SPSS Inc.) was used for statistical analysis. The t test was used to assess the differences between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsGTV, CTV and PTV in FLT PET-CT imaging are less than those of FDG (All p value less than 0.05). There are no significantly difference in conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) between FLT and FDG PET-CT planning (Both p value more than 0.05). The difference in V20 of bilateral lung, V40 of heart and maximal dose received by spinal cord between FLT and FDG were not significantly (All p value more than 0.05). While, the values in MLD, V5, V10, V30, V40 and V50 of bilateral lung, MHD, and V30 of heart on FLT PET-CT based planning were significant lower than that of FDG(All p value less than 0.05). GTV, CTV and PTV in FLT PET-CT imaging are less than those of FDG (All p value less than 0.05). There are no significantly difference in conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) between FLT and FDG PET-CT planning (Both p value more than 0.05). The difference in V20 of bilateral lung, V40 of heart and maximal dose received by spinal cord between FLT and FDG were not significantly (All p value more than 0.05). While, the values in MLD, V5, V10, V30, V40 and V50 of bilateral lung, MHD, and V30 of heart on FLT PET-CT based planning were significant lower than that of FDG(All p value less than 0.05). ConclusionsFLT PET-CT based treatment planning brought potential benefits to some OARs such as lungs and heart.[Key words] Esophageal neoplasms/radiotherapy; Tomography, positron emission; 3-deoxy-3-fluorothymidine; Biological tumor volumes; Dosimetry FLT PET-CT based treatment planning brought potential benefits to some OARs such as lungs and heart.