Abstract:Cognitive control refers to two critical processes: signal monitoring and inhibitory control. Before executing inhibitory control, the individual first monitors the signal of conflict or warning. However, whether the reward influences signal monitoring or inhibitory control remains poorly understood. In addition, some literature employed pretask reward cueing to study the effect of reward, but the role of pretask reward cueing on cognitive control was influenced by response strategies rather than stimulus processing. To address the above issues, the present study designed three novel variants of the classical stop signal task that combined the reward with certain stimuli or stimulus features and held stimulus-processing demands constant while varying attention demands. For experiment 1, participants tried to cancel responses on trials that were interrupted by the infrequent triangle but not to slow the initiation of the response. The results indicated that the SSRTs could be further accelerated if successful response inhibition were rewarded. Experiment 2 involved separation of signal monitoring from the stop signal task. Participants responded by pressing the left or right button when the trials were interrupted by the infrequent triangle. The results showed that participants could monitor a signal faster when the signal was associated with reward and conflicted with current behavior tendencies. Accordingly, we considered that the individual could more quickly activate behavior in correspondence with the signal and control the conflict because the signal monitoring was enhanced by reward, which indicated that the process needs more attention. Experiment 3 is the same as the second experiment, except that when trials were interrupted by an inverse triangle, participants made a dual button press. We found that the reaction time of the reward-related signal was shorter than that of the reward-unrelated signal in Go trials, even though the processing of the stop signal depletes the attention resource. These findings indicate that the reward-related signal captures more attention and enhances signal monitoring. In summary, these findings show that the reward-related signal captures more attention than bias for the enhancement of signal monitoring, thereby leading to more efficient stimulus processing and improving cognitive control.

Subliminal Reward Modulates the Tradeoff Between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Reward Modulates Unconsciously Triggered Adaptive Control Processes

The Mechanisms and Influential Factors of the Tradeoff Between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control

Neural signature of reward-modulated unconscious inhibitory control

Reward Improves Cognitive Control by Enhancing Signal Monitoring

The Motivation-Based Promotion of Proactive Control: the Role of Salience Network

Reward Interacts with Modality Shift to Reduce Cross-Modal Conflict.

Influence of Supraliminal Reward Information on Unconsciously Triggered Response Inhibition

The Effect of Supraliminal and Subliminal Reward Information on Conscious and Unconscious Response Inhibition

Timing characteristics of reactive and proactive emotion regulation

The role of proactive control on subcomponents of language control: Evidence from trilinguals

Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.

Brain Connectivity Modulation by Bayesian Surprise in Relation to Control Demand Drives Cognitive Flexibility Via Control Engagement

The Postdictive Effect of Choice Reflects the Modulation of Attention on Choice

Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control

Reward Improves Response Inhibition by Enhancing Attentional Capture

Reward produces learning of a consciously inaccessible feature

Reward Expectation Modulates Multiple Stages of Auditory Conflict Control.

Motivational context and neurocomputation of stop expectation moderate early attention responses supporting proactive inhibitory control

Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict