Effects of Different Endometrial Preparations on the Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles of in Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Study Based on More Than 30,000 Cycles.

T. Du,Q. Chen,Q. Lyu,Y. Kuang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.978

IF: 6.7

2016-01-01

Fertility and Sterility

Abstract:To evaluate the effects of different endometrial preparations on the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Strictly controlled retrospective cohort study. Women undergoing 31,871 FET cycles of IVF/ICSI in the period between March 2003 and May 2015 were enrolled, and those with uterine abnormities, uterine disorders or disorder history, uterine or uterine cavity surgery and other conditions that were not suitable for matching were excluded. After that, women undergoing different endometrial preparations including natural cycles, hormone therapy cycles and stimulated cycles were strictly matched by age, number of cycles, number of prior full-term births, type of infertility, presence of Fallopian tubal diseases, previous Fallopian tubal surgery, previous ectopic pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis and male factor infertility, number of embryos transferred, stage of embryos transferred and endometrial thickness on embryo transfer (ET) day, and then divided into three groups according to the type of endometrial preparations: natural cycle group (n=4,098 FETs), hormone therapy cycle group (n=4,098 FETs) and stimulated cycle group (n=4,098 FETs). Statistical analyses were carried out by SPSS version 19.0. The normality of quantitative data was tested both by Kolmogorov-Smirnova test and Shapiro-Wilk test, and the Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were applied to obtain group comparisons as appropriate. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Main baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, number of cycles, number of prior full-term births, profiles of type of infertility, indications for IVF/ICSI and preexisting conditions including previous Fallopian tubal surgery and previous ectopic pregnancy, and FET characteristics including number of embryos transferred, number of good-quality embryos transferred, stage of embryos transferred and endometrial thickness on ET day had no statistically significant differences among the three groups. As for pregnancy outcome, the ectopic pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates also had no statistically significant differences among the three groups. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (47.6% vs. 44.0%, p=0.001, 47.6% vs. 43.3%, p<0.001, respectively) and live birth delivery rate (31.1% vs. 28.2%, p=0.004, 31.1% vs.26.4%, p<0.001, respectively) were statistically significant higher in stimulated cycle group both than in natural cycle group and in hormone therapy cycle group while no statistically significant differences were detected between the latter two groups. Stimulated cycles are associated with significant higher clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rate both than natural cycles and hormone therapy cycles in FET cycles of IVF/ICSI.