Abstract:STUDY QUESTION:Does the endometrial preparation protocol for frozen embryo transfer (FET) have an impact on perinatal outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER:Singleton newborns from conceptions after an artificial FET cycle had a higher risk of being large for gestational age (LGA). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY:Most previous studies have concentrated on the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates of different endometrial preparation protocols for FET. However, the impacts of these cycle regimens on perinatal outcomes including birthweight, gestational age (GA) and related outcomes require more investigation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION:We retrospectively analysed all singletons conceived by women who underwent non-donor FET cycles between July 2014 and July 2017. The propensity score matching (PSM) method using nearest neighbour matching at a proportion of 1:1 was established to adjust for factors that influence the probability of receiving different FET cycle regimens. The main outcomes of the study included birthweight and its related outcomes, Z-score, low birthweight (LBW, <2500 g), small for gestational age (SGA, ≤10th percentile of referential birthweight), LGA (≥90th percentile of referential birthweight) and macrosomia (birthweight >4000 g). The study outcomes also included GA at birth, preterm delivery (<37 weeks), very preterm delivery (<32 weeks), very low birthweight (VLBW, <1500 g), term LBW (at 37 weeks of gestation or greater) and preterm LBW (at <37 weeks of gestation). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS:A total of 9267 cycles with live-born singletons were included in the analysis in our centre between July 2014 and July 2017. Of these, 2224, 4299 and 2744 live-born singletons were conceived by natural cycle FET, stimulated cycle FET and artificial cycle FET, respectively. After PSM, 1947 cycles of natural cycle FET versus stimulated cycle FET, 1682 cycles of stimulated cycle FET versus artificial cycle FET and 2333 cycles of natural cycle FET versus artificial cycle FET were included in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE:A higher mean birthweight and Z-score were observed in the artificial cycle FET group than in the stimulated cycle FET group (P = 0.005; P = 0.004, respectively). Singleton newborns conceived after artificial cycle FET were more likely to be LGA than those born after natural cycle FET or stimulated cycle FET (19.92% versus 16.94% and 19.29% versus 16.12%, respectively). The adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 1.25 (1.05, 1.49) for artificial cycle FET compared with natural cycle FET (P = 0.014) and 1.26 (1.08, 1.46) for artificial cycle FET compared with stimulated cycle FET (P = 0.003). Newborns conceived after stimulated cycle FET had a lower mean GA at birth and a lower mean birthweight than those born after natural cycle FET or artificial cycle FET. The stimulated cycle FET group had lower adjusted odds of being macrosomia than the natural cycle FET group. No significant differences between natural cycle FET and stimulated cycle FET were found for any of the other outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION:This study had the disadvantage of being retrospective, and some cases were excluded due to missing data. The original allocation process was not randomized, which may have introduced bias. We have chosen not to account for multiple comparisons in our statistical analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS:LGA can have long-term consequences in terms of risk for disease, which means that the influences of artificial cycle FET are of clinical significance and deserve more attention. Furthermore, these findings are critical for clinicians to be able to make an informed decision when choosing an endometrial preparation method. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S):This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31770989 to Y.W.) and the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Foundation of China (JYLJ030 to Y.W.). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Endometrial preparation for frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Perinatal Outcomes of Neonates Born from Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols after Frozen Embryo Transfer: a Retrospective Cohort Study

P-407 Pregnancy outcomes of different endometrial preparation in patients with a history of cesarean section

Effect of different endometrial preparation protocols on pregnancy outcomes in frozen- embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

Comparison the Effectiveness and Safety of Letrozolestimulated and Hormone Replacement Treatment in Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Retrospective analysis of the endometrial preparation protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in women with endometriosis

Effect of different endometrial preparation methods on pregnancy outcome of FET in women with a normal menstrual cycle

Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols Yield Similar Pregnancy Outcomes for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Patients with Advanced Endometriosis

Pituitary Suppression with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Artificial Endometrial Preparation in Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Different Protocols and Infertile Populations

Endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen embryo transfer - convenience or safety?

Clinical Outcomes and Placental Pathological Characteristics after Fresh Embryo Transfer and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer with Different Endometrial Preparation Protocols:a Retrospective Study

The endometrial preparation protocol of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with hormone replacement therapy can improve the reproductive outcomes in women under FET cycles: a retrospective study.

Comparison of two mainstream endometrial preparation regimens in vitrified–warmed embryo transfers after PGT

Comparison of Endometrial Preparation Protocols (natural Cycle Versus Hormone Replacement Cycle) for Frozen Embryo Transfer (COMPETE): a Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Effects of Different Endometrial Preparations on the Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles of in Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Study Based on More Than 30,000 Cycles.

Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices

Pregnancy Outcomes after Different Cycle Regimens for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching

Effects on Outcomes of Different Kinds of Endometrial Preparation Methods in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles During in Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer

Pregnancy Outcomes of Four Different Cycle Protocols for Frozen Embryo Transfer: a Large Retrospective Cohort Study

What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles among anovulatory women? A retrospective cohort study

Effects of Different Cycle Regimens for Frozen Embryo Transfer on Perinatal Outcomes of Singletons