P-407 Pregnancy outcomes of different endometrial preparation in patients with a history of cesarean section

R Gan,F Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac107.384

IF: 6.1

2022-01-01

Human Reproduction

Abstract:Abstract Study question To investigate the efficacies of three cycle regimens in women receiving frozen embryo transfer with a history of cesarean section(CS). Summary answer In women undergoing frozen embryo transfer with a history of CS, hormone replacement therapy for endometrial preparation was associated with a higher early miscarriage rate. What is known already Rates of CS are rising worldwide. Many women with a history of a CS delivery conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) are in need of frozen embryo transfer (FET) for their second progeny. Various protocols for endometrium preparation have been used to provide an optimal uterine environment for the transfer of thawed embryos, but the evidence supporting the superiority of one protocol over another is insufficient. Study design, size, duration A retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 6,159) with a history of CS who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study from January 2014 to December 2019 at the CITIC-Xiangya Hospital of Reproduction and Genetics. Participants/materials, setting, methods Reproductive outcomes of patients in the natural cycle （NC） (n = 4,306) versus hormone replacement therapy（HRT） (n = 1,007) versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist （GnRH-a） + HRT groups (n = 846) were compared. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the potential confounding factors. Main results and the role of chance The unadjusted odds of the miscarriage rate of singleton pregnancies were also significantly higher in the hormone replacement therapy compared with the natural cycle (25.5% versus 20.4%, respectively). After adjusting for possible confounding factors, the early miscarriage rate and the miscarriage rate of singleton pregnancies remained significantly higher in the hormone replacement therapy than the natural cycle. The clinical pregnancy rates in the hormone replacement therapy, hormone replacement therapy and treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist of women with a history of cesarean section was 48.8%, 48% and 47.1%, respectively, and the live birth rates were 37%, 34.1% and 35.7%, respectively. Limitations, reasons for caution This study is limited by its retrospective design. Furthermore, the detailed ultrasound information on uterine myometrial defects, complications related to CS and the number of previous CSs were unavailable in our study. Another limitation is that pregnancy-related complications and neonatal outcomes were not analyzed. Wider implications of the findings Our study could help physicians improve their understanding of the impact of different protocols on pregnancy outcomes in patients with a history of CS. Prospective randomized trials should be conducted to assess the efficacy of endometrial preparation protocols for FET in women with a history of CS. Trial registration number not applicable