Thermal Impact of Co2 Injection on Geomechanical Response at the Futuregen 2.0 Site: A Three-Dimensional Thermo-Geomechanical Approach

Ba Nghiep Nguyen,Zhangshuan Hou,Mark L. Stewart,Christopher J. Murray,Alain Bonneville
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.026
IF: 4.4
2016-01-01
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Abstract:The impact of temperature variations of the injected CO2 on the mechanical integrity of a reservoir is an important problem but rarely addressed in the design of a CO2 storage site. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) thermo-geomechanical approach was developed to evaluate the possibility of fracturing the FutureGen 2.0 site due to injection of CO2 at different temperatures. The approach sequentially coupled the STOMP-CO2 code for flow and thermal analyses to the ABAQUS (R) finite element package for performing thermo-geomechanical analyses of this site. The 3D STOMP-CO2 model of the FutureGen 2.0 site contains four horizontal wells and variable layer thickness, flow and thermal properties. The 3D ABAQUS (R) finite element (FE) model for thermo-geomechanical analysis which exactly maps the STOMP-CO2 model contains variable thermo-geomechanical properties. Boundary conditions were prescribed to the FE model to achieve the strike-slip faulting stress regime observed at the FutureGen 2.0 site. The STOMP-CO2 model takes into account the results from modeling the heat exchange between the environment and CO2 during its transport in the pipeline and injection wells before reaching the reservoir, as well as its interaction with the reservoir host rock. Injection temperature in the reservoir, whose initial temperature was 36 degrees C, was varied, and two cases were simulated and modeled: 28 degrees C, the minimum possible temperature considered as an extreme case since it corresponds to winter conditions maintained during the 20 years of the injection, and 47 degrees C that represents the annual average injection temperature. The STOMP-CO2/ABAQUS (R) analyses indicate lower injection temperatures approaching 28 degrees C could locally induce shear slip activation close to the wells and confined to the reservoir. Thermally induced hydraulic fracture is not expected for the 28 degrees C-47 degrees C injection temperature range or higher. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?