Echocardiography for Diagnosing Left Ventricular Dilatation and Systolic Dysfunction

张运,张薇,王勇,邢艳秋,季晓平,张梅,李继福
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1004-4477.2001.10.002
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy of M mode (MME) ,two dimensional (2DE) and three dimensional (3DE) echocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction.Methods With quantitative left ventriculography (LVG) as a comparison standard,the accuracy of MME (using Teichholtz formula),2DE (using biplane Simpson formula) and multiplane transesophageal 3DE in detecting increased left ventricular end diastolic(EDV) and end systolic(ESV) volume and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared in 37 patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension.Results ① Using LVG determined EDV110 ml/m 2 as the diagnostic criteria,the diagnostic accuracies of MME,2DE and 3DE were 73.0% , 75.7% and 94.6% respectively,and the accuracy of 3DE was significantly higher than that of MME and 2DE (P 0.05 ).② Using LVG determined ESV44 ml/m 2 as the diagnostic criteria,the diagnostic accuracies of MME,2DE and 3DE were 81.1% , 81.1% and 97.3% respectively (P 0.05 ).③ Using LVG determined LVEF 50% as the diagnostic criteria,the diagnostic accuracies of MME,2DE and 3DE were 60.0% , 72.9% and 94.6% respectively,and the accuracy of 3DE was significantly higher than that of MME and 2DE (P 0.01 and P 0.05 respectively).Conclusions The accuracy of 3DE in detecting left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction is similar to that of LVG while significantly higher than that of MME and 2DE.Consequently,3DE should be regarded as a new standard in the quantitative evaluation of heart failure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?