Clinical Application of Combined Interventional Procedure in Aged Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases

卢才义,王士雯,魏璇,刘玲玲,胡桃红,晏沐阳,薛桥,李玉峰,赵玉生

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5403.2003.03.006

2003-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined interventional procedure (CIF) in aged patients with cardiovascular diseases. Methods Consecutive patients treated with interventional therapy in two years were divided into aged group and common group. Following parameters were collected and compared: age, gender, cardiovascular disease, intervention indication, combined interventional procedure, procedure time, fluoroscopy lime, success rate, complication rate and mortality. Results ①The indication rates of CIP in all patients, common group and aged one were 14.5% (258/1785), 4.6% (44/961) and6.0% (214/824), respectively. The actual CIP rates in above three groups were 50% (129/258), 59% (26/44) and 48.1% (103/214). ②In aged group, procedures of coronary, peripheral and renal artery stenting, pacemaker implantation and percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization were performed significantly more frequently than in common one, but procedures of radiofrequency catheter ablation, valvular balloon angio-plasty and congenital heart disease occlusion were significantly lass frequent than in common one. CIP in aged group was also significantly more frequent than in common one. ③ The success rate, complication rate and mortality rate of two groups were comparable, but the expense, procedure and fluoroscopy time as well as the amount of contrast medium used in the former were significantly higher, longer and larger respectively than those in the latter. Conclusions ① CIP rate in aged is significantly higher than in common adults. ② Rational CIP conducted with caution in aged is as effective and safe as single intervention procedure in both aged and common adults. ③ CIP in aged has the disadvantages of high expense, long procedure and fluoroscopy time and large contrast medium amount.