Comparison of VRT with VBS in the Evaluation of Tracheobronchial Tree Involvement Due to Central Lung Cancer

王建卫,吴宁,黄遥,朱强
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2002.06.005
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluated volume rendering technique (VRT) and virtual bronchoscopy (VBS) in observing tracheobronchial tree involvement due to central lung cancer. Materials and Methods In a prospective series, spiral CT (Picker 6000 scanner) examination was performed in 52 patients with suspected central lung cancer. Six patients were excluded after operation. The study volume was from the level of aortic arch to the level of inferior pulmonary veins. Using 3 mm collimation and 1.0 pitch, the scanning was completed with a single breath hold. The image was reconstructed at 1 mm interval. VRT images were compared with VBS images by three radiologists in a blind way. The image findings were compared with the surgical and pathological results.Results Reconstructed image quality was graded as excellent (50%) or good (41.3%), whereas poor image quality due to motion related artifacts was seen in 8.7% of cases. In displaying branches, VRT was more sensitive, specific and accurate than VBS (86.9% vs 66.7%, 93.1% vs 86.2% and 88.5% vs 71.7%, respectively). The difference in sensitivity and accuracy between VRT and VBS was statistically significant (P=0.002 in both).Conclusion VRT is more directly perceived and more accurate than VBS, it can substitute for VBS in evaluating neoplastic invasion of tracheobronchial tree.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?