Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

On the Feudal Political Structure in the Medieval Western Europe

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

Society of Imperial Power: Reinterpreting China’s “Feudal Society”

Transformation of European States: From Feudal to Modern

The Study on the Thoughts of Separation of Power and Anti-Authoritarian in the Reviving Feudalism Proposal during the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties

The Staggered Development of the Form of European States: from Feudalism to Modernism

The Era of Prefectures and Counties: An Inquiry into the Power Structure and State Governance in Ancient Chinese Society

The Nobility in the European Middle Ages

On the Characteristics of Chinese Legal Culture by Studying the Ancient Liege Relationship

Heaven,Kingship and the Royal Power: Fundamental Structure of Kingship Politics and its Function to Rectify Civilization

Embryo of Civil Society--Historical Roles of Medieval European Cities and Bourgeoisie

The Discussion of the Feudal Provincial System of Han Dynasty

Feudalism in China and India: A Comparative Study

The Historical Development of Western Political Civilization

A Review of “Feudal Society” (Symposium)

Droit de Seigneur in the Modern Jiangsu and Shandong Area:Social Stratification and Personality Alteration

Comparison of Education System Between China and the West in Middle Ages

Restriction or Promotion? Charters and Commerce in Medieval Europe