Abstract:In Chinese history, the power relationship between the central and local governments has undergone perennial and critical changes. These changes have given rise to three questions: First, why did some dynasties adopt feudalism at an early stage, merely to curtail the local authority in times of stability? Second, why did the Yuan and Ming dynasties employ a native chieftain system, while the Qing dynasty struggled to bureaucratise the native officers in ethnic minority areas? Third, why were the dynasties of Han ethnicity so hesitant to set up a provincial government while nomadic societies did not view this as a dilemma? Furthermore, why was the Qing dynasty, which was ethnically Han, able to break down these contradictions and create a stable provincial government and provincial state? This paper demonstrates that these changes may be explained by the propensity of the rulers to minimise the ruling risks and constraints that they encountered. Specifically, the ruler’s decision to centralise or decentralise power was constrained by certain challenges, such as fiscal and administrative costs, military technology limitations and political competition. These constraints impelled the ruling class to deviate from the system of prefectures and countries. Under these circumstances, the central government was forced to endure higher social risks and also the potential delegation of power. However, it would reduce the social and delegate risks provided that the constraints were loosened, which triggered the evolution of a power structure between the central and local governments. Another potential driving force behind the changes in the power structure was the dynamic between the social and agency risks. When these risks increased, the central government would readjust the centralisation and decentralisation of power at different government levels to control the rising risks.

The Discussion of the Feudal Provincial System of Han Dynasty

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

The Research on the Mainstream Criticism of Academics in the Han Dynasty

How was the feudal rule in the Han Dynasty Positively Affected by Confucianism?

Langguan System and Confucianism in the Han Dynasty

The Division of the Imperial Examinations and Provincial Administrations:The Formation of the Provinces of Hubei and Hunan in Qing Dynasty

The Partition of Jiangnan,Huguang and Shaanxi Provinces and the Change of the Provincial System at the beginning of the Qing Dynasty

Redaction of Zhou Guan and Hejian Confucianism in the Western Han Dynasty

Society of Imperial Power: Reinterpreting China’s “Feudal Society”

The Era of Prefectures and Counties: An Inquiry into the Power Structure and State Governance in Ancient Chinese Society

Discussion on the Reasons for Implementing Prefectures System in Qin Dynasty

Development of the Urban Administrative Management System in North China:also on Provincial Administrative Divisions of the Jin Dynasty

FEDERALISM AND THE BALANCE OF POWER: CHINA'S HAN AND TANG DYNASTIES AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE

Sectarian Disputes? Or the Adoption of Both the Han and Song Doctrines?--The Intention of The Discussion and Consideration of the Han School of Classical Philosophy by Fang Dongshu

Evolution of the Prefectures Within the Jurisdiction of the Department of Jingzhou Prefectural Govemor in the Eastern Han Dynasty

The Study on the Thoughts of Separation of Power and Anti-Authoritarian in the Reviving Feudalism Proposal during the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties

Hejian Xianwang and Confucianism during the Period of Jing and Wu Emperors in the Han Dynasty

Tumen's Prefecture and Minghan's Subprefecture: The Mongolian Military System of Minghan and Zuutand the Local Han-Chinese Administrative System of Lu,Fu,Zhou,andJun in North China

A study into the incident of the Hongdumen Academy

On the Concerns and Limitations of the Confucianism during Han Dynasty

Does “Taichang Prefecture" Exist in The Western Han Dynasty—Few issues related to “Taichang" from the research perspective of the West Han political region