Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Causes for Biliary-Pancreatic Duct Dilatation

谢晓燕,吕明德,崔毅,李初俊,杉山政则,跗见裕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0529-5815.2001.06.014

2001-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the diagnosis of causes for cholangiopancreatic duct dilatation (CPDD). [WT5”HZ]Methods[WT5”BZ] Twenty five patients with CPDD without visual lesions or with unconfirmed lesions in traditional ultrasonography (US) were re examined by EUS, CT and MRI. Of the 25 patients, 19 had periampullary tumor , 3 incarcerated stone at the lower fragment of the common bile duct and 3 obstruction for other causes. [WT5”HZ]Results[WT5”BZ] As compared with the results of postoperative pathological examination, the detection rate of obstructive lesions by US, EUS, CT and MRI was 17 4% (4/23), 82 6% (19/23), 21 7% (5/23) and 26 7% (4/15), respectively. Their detection rate of tumors was 10 5% (2/19), 84 2% (16/19), 15 7% (3/19) and 23 1% (3/13), respectively. The accuracy of tumor localization by EUS was 87 5%. None of the patients with incarcerated stone were confirmed by US. However, all the patients were confirmed by EUS except, 2 by CT and 1 by MRI. [WT5”HZ]Conclusions[WT5”BZ] EUS is much more sensitive in detecting obstructive lesions and accurate in determining tumor location than US, CT and MRI. However, it is still difficult for EUS to diagnose the papillary tumor or common bile duct tumor with a diameter less than 1 cm.