Abstract:Objective To develop a new statistical method for comparing effectiveness of two treatments for the same disease indication.A statistical method needs to be developed to compare effectiveness of different treatments by using existing clinical data when lacking of evidence from randomized controlled trials.Methods Datasets including an outcome variable and a confounder for two treatments were simulated.Subjects in each dataset were randomly divided into two arms for 100 times,and the means were compared by using student-t tests and Per-protocol analysis strategy was applied.Subjects with assigned treatment by randomization that was contradictory to the actual received treatment were considered drop-out of conventional RCTs,and were excluded from comparisons of means.The ratio of the frequency of hypothesis tests that rejected H0 to the frequency of hypothesis tests that did not reject H0,called odds,was used to predict the probability of significant tests for group difference.To document the consistency and reliability of the method,the distribution of odds and its 95% CI,and the confounding effect were described in simulated datasets with various between-group mean differences and statistical power(ranging from 0.5 to 0.85) with varied sample sizes(n=50,100,500,and 1 000).Stata 11.0 was used to program and perform the analysis.Results The odds and its 95%CI of simulated RCTs were perfectly and linearly correlated with the change of between-group mean differences and statistical power,by difference sample size.A conclusion could be made based on the hypothesis of the simulated randomized controlled trials(sRCT).The probability of loss of balance of confounding was over 95% for equal and unequal sample size of two arms after excluding misclassified subjects.Conclusions The proposed novel analytical method,simulated RCTs based on real clinical treatment data,can be used to compare effectiveness of two treatments when evidence from RCTs is unavailable.

EVALUATION OF THE k-DEPENDENT SAMPLES NONPARAMETRIC TESTS IN SAS SOFTWARE.

Exploring Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials When Some of the Patients are Treated against the Randomization

Nonparametric Response-Adaptive Randomization for Continuous Responses

Statistical Inference of the Class of Nonparametric Tests for the Panel Count and Current Status Data from the Perspective of the Saddlepoint Approximation

Sample size determination based on rank tests in clinical trials.

A novel statistical method for comparing effectiveness of two treatments-simulated randomized controlled trials

The Influence of Sample Size and Intra-class Correlation on the Inference of the Intervention Effect in a Cluster Randomized Intervention Study

Tests for Many Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Panel Data Models

Comparing type 1 and type 2 error rates of different tests for heterogeneous treatment effects

Simultaneous Analysis of Variance Tests Using Friedman's χ r2 Statistics

Are the tests overpowered or underpowered? A unified solution to correctly specify type I errors in design of clinical trials for two sample proportions

A difference-based method for testing no effect in nonparametric regression

On Testing the Mean Equivalence of Treatments from Correlated Normal Populations

Impact of Sample Size and Variability on the Power and Type I Error Rates of Equivalence Tests: A Simulation Study.

Robust Tests for Treatment Effect in Survival Analysis under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

A Joint Test for Parametric Specification and Independence in Nonlinear Regression Models

Dealing with Non-inferiority Test in Multicenter Trials

A modified Friedman test for randomized complete block designs

Randomization Tests for Equality in Dependence Structure

Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost

Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method