Abstract:Correlated proportions arise in longitudinal (panel) studies. A typical example is the ``opinion swing'' problem: ``Has the proportion of people favoring a politician changed after his recent speech to the nation on TV?''. Since the same group of individuals is interviewed before and after the speech, the two proportions are correlated. A natural null hypothesis to be tested is whether the corresponding population proportions are equal. A standard Bayesian approach to this problem has already been considered in the literature, based on a Dirichlet prior for the cell-probabilities of the underlying two-by-two table under the alternative hypothesis, together with an induced prior under the null. In lack of specific prior information, a diffuse (e.g. uniform) distribution may be used. We claim that this approach is not satisfactory, since in a testing problem one should make sure that the prior under the alternative be adequately centered around the region specified by the null, in order to obtain a fair comparison between the two hypotheses. Following an intrinsic prior methodology, we develop two strategies for the construction of a collection of objective priors increasingly peaked around the null. We provide a simple interpretation of their structure in terms of weighted imaginary sample scenarios. We illustrate our method by means of three examples, carrying out sensitivity analysis and providing comparison with existing results.

On Testing the Mean Equivalence of Treatments from Correlated Normal Populations

Comparing Ratios of the Mean to a Power of Variance in Two Samples Via Self-Normalized Test Statistics

A New Generalized P-Value Approach for Testing Equality of Coefficients of Variation in K Normal Populations

Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

An adjusted-range based self-normalization test for correlation change

On Two-Sample Mean Tests under Spiked Covariances

Adjusted-range based self-normalized tests for correlation constancy

ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL STATISTICS: COMPARING MEANS UNDER NORMAL DISTRIBUTION THEORY

The Extended Anderson and Hauck Tests and Sample Size Procedures for Equivalence Assessment in Simple Linear Regressions

Correct Statistical Test to Find the Equivalence Between Two Clinical Treatment Effects

A Note on Sample Size Calculation for Mean Comparisons Based on Noncentral T-Statistics.

Mean Test with Fewer Observation than Dimension and Ratio Unbiased Estimator for Correlation Matrix

The Test for the Equality of the Probability Distribution of Two Populations with Nominal Scales

Bayesian Optimal Two-sample Tests in High-dimension

Statistical tests for homogeneity of variance for clinical trials and recommendations

Two-sample Test in High Dimensions Through Random Selection.

Intrinsic tests for the equality of two correlated proportions

Testing Monotonicity of Mean Potential Outcomes in a Continuous Treatment with High-Dimensional Data

Test for the statistical significance of a treatment effect in the presence of hidden sub-populations

Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity in observational studies