Abstract:BackgroundSmall number of clusters and large variation of cluster sizes commonly exist in cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) and are often the critical factors affecting the validity and efficiency of statistical analyses. F tests are commonly used in the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to test intervention effects in CRTs. The most challenging issue for the approximate Wald F test is the estimation of the denominator degrees of freedom (DDF). Some DDF approximation methods have been proposed, but their small sample performances in analysing binary outcomes in CRTs with few heterogeneous clusters are not well studied.MethodsThe small sample performances of five DDF approximations for the F test are compared and contrasted under CRT frameworks with simulations. Specifically, we illustrate how the intraclass correlation (ICC), sample size, and the variation of cluster sizes affect the type I error and statistical power when different DDF approximation methods in GLMM are used to test intervention effect in CRTs with binary outcomes. The results are also illustrated using a real CRT dataset.ResultsOur simulation results suggest that the Between-Within method maintains the nominal type I error rates even when the total number of clusters is as low as 10 and is robust to the variation of the cluster sizes. The Residual and Containment methods have inflated type I error rates when the cluster number is small (<30) and the inflation becomes more severe with increased variation in cluster sizes. In contrast, the Satterthwaite and Kenward-Roger methods can provide tests with very conservative type I error rates when the total cluster number is small (<30) and the conservativeness becomes more severe as variation in cluster sizes increases. Our simulations also suggest that the Between-Within method is statistically more powerful than the Satterthwaite or Kenward-Roger method in analysing CRTs with heterogeneous cluster sizes, especially when the cluster number is small.ConclusionWe conclude that the Between-Within denominator degrees of freedom approximation method for F tests should be recommended when the GLMM is used in analysing CRTs with binary outcomes and few heterogeneous clusters, due to its type I error properties and relatively higher power.

The Influence of Sample Size and Intra-class Correlation on the Inference of the Intervention Effect in a Cluster Randomized Intervention Study

Sample size calculation for treatment effects in randomized trials with fixed cluster sizes and heterogeneous intraclass correlations and variances

Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial

Sample size calculation in hierarchical 2×2 factorial trials with unequal cluster sizes

Influence of Center Effects and Imbalanced Sample Sizes Between Centers on Therapeutic Evaluation in Clinical Trials

Correcting Classifiers for Sample Selection Bias in Two-Phase Case-Control Studies

Nonparametric Method for Clustered Data in Pre-Post Factorial Design

Cluster Randomized Trials with a Pretest and Posttest: Equivalence of Three-, Two- and One-Level Analyses, and Sample Size Calculation

Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials

The impact of clustering binary data on relative risk towards a study of inferential methods

Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model

Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes

A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in cluster randomized trials

Exploring Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials When Some of the Patients are Treated against the Randomization

Sample Size Calculation for Cluster Randomized Trials with Zero-inflated Count Outcomes

Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials

Tutorial: a priori estimation of sample size, effect size, and statistical power for cluster analysis, latent class analysis, and multivariate mixture models

Testing for Treatment Effect in Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials with Generalized Linear Models and Omitted Covariates

Incorporating Contact Network Structure in Cluster Randomized Trials

Intent-to-treat Analysis of Cluster Randomized Trials when Clusters Report Unidentifiable Outcome Proportions.

At What Level Should One Cluster Standard Errors in Paired and Small-Strata Experiments?