A Comparison of HASTE and HASTE-IR Sequence for Detection of Hepatic Lesions

常时新,孔祥泉,刘定西,彭振军,肖学宏,于群,熊茵,江利,扬帆,徐海波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2000.10.009
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate breath holding T 2WI techniques (HASTE, HASTE IR) in detecting liver cancer.Materials and Methods Sixty two patients with liver cancer underwent T 2WI HASTE and HASTE IR. Images of the same anatomic slice obtained from the two sequences were compared. Mean signal intensity and standard deviation were recorded. Signal to noise ratios for liver, spleen and focal lesions were obtained through dividing the mean signal intensity by standard deviation of background noise. Contrast to noise ratios were obtained through dividing the absolute value of the liver lesion signal intensity difference by standard deviation of background noise.Results Liver SNR, spleen SNR, solid lesion relative CNR and spleen relative CNR for HASTE were 25.2±1.9, 39.7±5.4, 0.71±0.07 and 0.75±0.18, respectively, while for HASTE IR were 12.8±2.3, 25.2±7.5, 1.21±0.24 and 1.74±0.25, respectively. HASTE was inferior to HASTE IR in detecting solid liver lesions (t=1.94,2.35; P=0.030.05). Twelve smaller solid liver lesions were discovered on HASTE IR sequence, but could not display on HASTE sequence.Conclusion Though both breath holding HASTE sequence and HASTE IR sequence have high sensitivity in detecting solid liver lesion, HASTE IR is more sensitive than HASTE. HASTE IR may be served as one of the T 2WI conventional imaging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?